Hello,
I installed Bill's qmail toaster v.0.9.2(qmail + vpopmail without mysql) for
three of my domains. I want to allow all my user(intranet/internet) sending
emails only using smtp authentication for local & outside domain except
squirrelmail. Appreciate your suggestion.
Thanks,
Tarique
v -H -R -l 0 \
>>>>> -x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \
>>>>> -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \
>>>>> /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd \
>>>>> -r bl.spamcop.net \
>>>>>
t; exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 8000 \
>>>> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -R -l 0 \
>>>> -x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \
>>>> -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \
>>>> /usr/
org \
>>> -r combined.njabl.org \
>>> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
>>> /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/true 2>&1
>>
>>
>>> Please advisei want smtp-auth for all user...
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>&
ease advisei want smtp-auth for all user...
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tarique Saleh Mahmud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 8:51 PM
>> To: toaster@shupp.org
>> Subject: [toaster] smtp auth not working
>
>&g
---Original Message-
> From: Tarique Saleh Mahmud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 8:51 PM
> To: toaster@shupp.org
> Subject: [toaster] smtp auth not working
> I am facing problem with my smtp server. I want to use smtp auth option for
> all user w
th for all user...
-Original Message-
From: Tarique Saleh Mahmud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 8:51 PM
To: toaster@shupp.org
Subject: [toaster] smtp auth not working
I am facing problem with my smtp server. I want to use smtp auth option for
all user while s
I am facing problem with my smtp server. I want to use smtp auth option for
all user while sending mails but I found smtp auth is not working for local
users. Please verify my tcp.smtp file and advise.
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/default",Q
MAILQUEUE="bin/qmai
Okay after updating to the latest vpopmail, I saw alot of people having
issues while authenticating with smtp. I thought recompiling qmail with
toaster patch will do the job, but alas it didnt. After a day of trial
and checking AUTH PLAIN and AUTH LOGIN, it seems CRAM-MD5 was the
culprit for c
For ssl - did you make certficate and make tmprsadh
(http://www.shupp.org/toaster/?page=vpopmail) ?
For smtp greetings i think that isn't possible (maybe is possible via
some variable), but i think that you must run 2 separate qmail
(separate control files). Maybe sometime i write patch which load
Okay,
used netqmail-1.06, rebuilt with latest qmail-toaster-0.91. Needed
libdomainkeys to compile so got that as well, however the paths were
broken. It needed ../../libdomainkeys whereas its it was in
../libdomainkeys only, so did those changes.
Re-checked, MUSTAUTH works fine. , but my ssl
If you are using shupp toaster, use shupp's howto
http://www.shupp.org/toaster/. Which seems using new version (0.9.1).
in netqmail 1.06 aren't any significant changes (there is need to
patch base qmail-1.03 and contains already error.h patch)
So my suggestion is start from clean with shupp toast
So do you think i should recompile once again using the latest patches?
im using the old patches with netqmail-1.06 and updated chkuser.
Considering its a crazy hybrid system, would appreciate your input on
suggestions
Satish
Lampa wrote, On 2007-12-30 1:11 AM:
Hmm, little weird.
i'm using h
Hmm, little weird.
i'm using http://www.shupp.org/patches/qmail-toaster-0.9.1.patch.bz2
eg patch 0.9.1.
on main patch is link to older version but on
http://www.shupp.org/toaster/?page=gettingstarted
is to the newer version (0.9.1)
To Shupp: please update main page to point to latest patch vers
actually i see the problem. the patch is of 2.0.8, you need 2.0.9 to
make it work.
I had to go to http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/ and get the
latest update tarball. After that it seems to be working.
This seems to have fixed the problem.
Perhaps we can move the 2.0.9 patch into the
Hello,
in log is something ? Relayclient is not set, because if is set user
can sent email?
2007/12/29, Satish Alwani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> okay added that line.. recompiled as well, (make; make setup check )
> however its still not working. for now i am trying to do it on my ip
> address
okay added that line.. recompiled as well, (make; make setup check )
however its still not working. for now i am trying to do it on my ip address
ip.add.re.ss:allow,CHKUSER_MUSTAUTH=""
any suggestions on this? I also do have this going to qmail-scanner-st
as my default qmail-queue
Satish
Lam
i'm using 2 separate cdb files (one with MUSTAUTH for local users and
second for public mx) - two ip adresses
2007/12/29, Satish Alwani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> But it should work if i have 2 seperate cdb files to do this right? one for
> the local users / 1 for the public internet to MX to
>
>
But it should work if i have 2 seperate cdb files to do this right? one
for the local users / 1 for the public internet to MX to
Satish
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote, On 2007-12-29 6:51 PM:
Satish Alwani ha scritto:
Hi,
I have the qmail-toaster-0.8.3.patch, I am currently running 2
instances o
Hello,
you should have #define CHKUSER_EXTRA_MUSTAUTH_VARIABLE
"CHKUSER_MUSTAUTH" enabled (in chkuser_settings.h) and in tcp.smtp
CHKUSER_MUSTAUTH="" and RELAYCLIENT="" must be deleted or it will be
not working.
If you change anything in chkuser_settings.h, qmail must be recompiled
and installed
Satish Alwani ha scritto:
Hi,
I have the qmail-toaster-0.8.3.patch, I am currently running 2
instances of qmail-smtpd (on 2 different ips). 1 is for the users to
send the email from, 1 is for the MX record where their domain can get
emails.
What I would like to do is the smtp used as relay,
Hi,
I have the qmail-toaster-0.8.3.patch, I am currently running 2 instances
of qmail-smtpd (on 2 different ips). 1 is for the users to send the
email from, 1 is for the MX record where their domain can get emails.
What I would like to do is the smtp used as relay, should ONLY accept
emails
On Aug 3, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Muhammad Mukmin Pattikraton wrote:
On 8/3/07, Bill Shupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 2, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Muhammad Mukmin Pattikraton wrote:
Hello,
I know when someone has authenticated via SMTP AUTH mechanism, he or
she can send email with whatever sender a
On 8/3/07, Bill Shupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Muhammad Mukmin Pattikraton wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I know when someone has authenticated via SMTP AUTH mechanism, he or
> > she can send email with whatever sender address.
> > My question, is there a way to restric
On Aug 2, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Muhammad Mukmin Pattikraton wrote:
Hello,
I know when someone has authenticated via SMTP AUTH mechanism, he or
she can send email with whatever sender address.
My question, is there a way to restrict the sender address with the
address that being used to authenticate
Hello,
I know when someone has authenticated via SMTP AUTH mechanism, he or
she can send email with whatever sender address.
My question, is there a way to restrict the sender address with the
address that being used to authenticate ? Or at least restrict the
domain.
Any help would be appreciated
Hello,
i've problem with smtp authorization
tls works ok, non crypted (non tls/ssl) doesn't work,it returns "535
authentication failed (#5.7.1)" but more strange is that it doesn't works
only on few computers (tested in outlook there is ok second outlook got
error).
tested in kmail too (tls work
Max Andersen wrote:
Adi Pircalabu wrote:
Do you have another SMTP proxy in front of your system? That proxy
probably does not implement some SMTP extensions.
The cisco box was the reason. removed the fixup smtp or similar did the job.
Sincerely
Max
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographi
Adi Pircalabu wrote:
Do you have another SMTP proxy in front of your system? That proxy
probably does not implement some SMTP extensions.
I've just investigated, and My cisco 806 at home does not have the fixup
smtp configuration, and the router is all that is between me and the
mailserver.
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:19:51 +0200
Max Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet linux01.netformidling.dk 25
> Trying ...
> Connected to linux01.netformidling.dk.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 linux01.netformidling.dk ESMTP
> ehlo test
> 502
Do you have another SMTP pr
Max Andersen wrote:
Hi,
How do I test the smtp-auth ?
I do seem to have been running smtp-auth, but now my servere rejects
me when I try :(
I've dug a bit deeper and see this:
when connecting from the lan I get the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# telnet linux01.netformidling.dk 25
T
Hi,
How do I test the smtp-auth ?
I do seem to have been running smtp-auth, but now my servere rejects me
when I try :(
Sincerely
Max
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
I have a client who's qmail server was setup before I learned of Shupp
Toaster. I'm trying to get them to allow me to reinstall the server,
but in the meantime they have a need for smtp-auth. I've downloaded
netqmail-1.05-tls-smtpauth-20060105.patch and patched a vanilla
netqmail-1.05 and it comp
On Jan 20, 2006, at 7:44 AM, Bruno Negrao wrote:
My question is, if I set TCPREMOTEINFO in my tcprules for that machine,
will it release the machine from authentication?
If you set RELAYCLIENT, you won't have to authenticate.
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.s
Ok, setting TCPREMOTEINFO in tcp.smtp file works.
bnegrao.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruno Negrao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:44 PM
Subject: [toaster] SMTP AUTH: Setting TCPREMOTEINFO for an IP can release
it from smtp authentication?
Hi guys,
I enabled SMTP authentication in my qmail-toaster server and it's working
fine.
But I need to allow one machine (say, ip: 192.168.0.4) to send emails
without authenticating.
I read that when a SMTP connection was successfully authenticated, the
environment variable TCPREMOTEINFO is set
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 19:57 +0800, aim mix wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> can someone explain to me why ?
>
> my /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run
>
> ...
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd HOSTNAME \
> /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/true 2>&1
>
> ...
>
>if the word HOSTNAME there the sm
Greetings,
can someone explain to me why ?
my /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run
... /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd HOSTNAME \ /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/true 2>&1
...
if the word HOSTNAME there the smtp-auth won't work. it must be blank then the smtp-auth will work. i don't know w
thank you very much. i will test it today.
On 1/16/06, Bill Shupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
aim mix wrote:> thanks bill.>>In my tcp.smtp>>127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>> xx.xx.xx.xx:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan">:allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/sims
aim mix wrote:
thanks bill.
In my tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
xx.xx.xx.xx:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan"
:allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan"
where xx.xx.xx.xx is my ip address, do i need to remove my ip address
in order to
thanks bill.
In my tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" xx.xx.xx.xx:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan" :allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan"
where xx.xx.xx.xx is my ip address, do i need to remove my ip address in order to make smtp-auth work ?
aim mix wrote:
Greetings all,
hi, i need to know how to do smtp-auth based on shupp toaster.
in the frontpage,
To do SMTP-AUTH, and chkuser, you need to run qmail-smtpd as user
vpopmail, group vchkpw if you plan on using this with vpopmail (the
certificates are chowned vpopmail for this r
Greetings all,
hi, i need to know how to do smtp-auth based on shupp toaster.
in the frontpage,
To do SMTP-AUTH, and chkuser, you need to run qmail-smtpd as user vpopmail, group vchkpw if you plan on using this with vpopmail (the certificates are chowned vpopmail for this reason).
is it ne
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 08:06:16AM -0800, Bill Shupp wrote:
> >What is the best way to use SMTP-AUTH and tcpserver's reverse DNS checking
> >and rblsmtpd? I want to allow users with SMTP-AUTH from addresses that
> >are in rbl lists or no reverse DNS entry.
> >
> >I dont want to bind another qmail-
Erki-Kiss Zsolt wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:29:02PM +0100, rene marticke wrote:
i solved this by installing another qmail without rblsmtp on another
ip-adress at the same host using vserver.
the second on use mysql-tables from master and so it's up2date.
Hm, http://linux-vserv
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:29:02PM +0100, rene marticke wrote:
> i solved this by installing another qmail without rblsmtp on another
> ip-adress at the same host using vserver.
> the second on use mysql-tables from master and so it's up2date.
Hm, http://linux-vserver.org/ sounds great! But yet
Erki-Kiss Zsolt wrote:
What is the best way to use SMTP-AUTH and tcpserver's reverse DNS checking
and rblsmtpd? I want to allow users with SMTP-AUTH from addresses that
are in rbl lists or no reverse DNS entry.
I dont want to bind another qmail-smtpd to another port than 25. I have a
lot of user
Hi,
i solved this by installing another qmail without rblsmtp on another
ip-adress at the same host using vserver.
the second on use mysql-tables from master and so it's up2date.
regards
rene
Erki-Kiss Zsolt schrieb:
What is the best way to use SMTP-AUTH and tcpserver's reverse DNS checking
What is the best way to use SMTP-AUTH and tcpserver's reverse DNS checking
and rblsmtpd? I want to allow users with SMTP-AUTH from addresses that
are in rbl lists or no reverse DNS entry.
I dont want to bind another qmail-smtpd to another port than 25. I have a
lot of users, that dont understand t
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the suggesstion about logging for MySQL. I will give
that a try. Yes, i did try using AUTH PLAIN and it too doesn't work.
I also compiled vpopmail with clear passwords as well. Just as a
test, i recompiled vpopmail with roaming-users on, and it works fine.
BUT if I enabl
On 9/25/05, Jason (AMD_) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good Evening Bill,
> Still having my smtp auth problem here :( I just got done doing a
> complete reinstall of vpopmail and qmail using your guide and it still
> won't work. The weird thing is that I am getting this error when
> tryingto d
Good Evening Bill,
Still having my smtp auth problem here :( I just got done doing a
complete reinstall of vpopmail and qmail using your guide and it still
won't work. The weird thing is that I am getting this error when
tryingto do a manual SMTP 'AUTH LOGIN' (after i enter my username and
pa
Bill,
I just looked in my logs and saw this:
vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAILADDY]:[IPADDY]
The email address is correct though. Authentication via pop3d works
fine with it. It's like the smtp auth isn't looking up the password
in MySQL's db or something???
-- HP
On 9/24/05, Jas
Hi Bill,
Thanks for the quick response.
It was running as root:qmail but I changed it to vpopmail:vchkpw and
restarted the services but it still won't work :( The weird thing is
it's even making me authenticate (or try to authenticate) when sending
to local domains as well.
-- HP
On 9/24/05,
Jason (AMD_) wrote:
Hi,
Let me first say what an awesome resource this is :) Thanks!
Now then, I've got a working toaster install EXCEPT for smtp-auth.
Here is my qmail-smtpd/run file:
exec softlimit -m 1000 \
tcpserver -v -H -R -l 0 \
-x /var/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$M
Hi,
Let me first say what an awesome resource this is :) Thanks!
Now then, I've got a working toaster install EXCEPT for smtp-auth.
Here is my qmail-smtpd/run file:
exec softlimit -m 1000 \
tcpserver -v -H -R -l 0 \
-x /var/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \
-u "$QMA
Hi,
I'm not sure if this patch applies correctly against the Toaster, but I
have been using this patch (was originally against qmail-1.03 and now
applies against netqmail-1.05) for years.
control/smtproutes has the following format using this patch :-
{domain}:{relay host}:{relay port}:{relay u
Glen wrote:
Hi,
I want to add the
qmail-authentication-0.6.4 patch to the toaster. because i want to
relay mail to authenticated server. Just now its with
the qmail-smtpd-auth-0.5.7 patch
Is there any way we can include
this toaster
Thanks in advance
I too would lik
Hi,
I want to add the qmail-authentication-0.6.4 patch
to the toaster. because i want to relay mail to authenticated
server. Just now its with the qmail-smtpd-auth-0.5.7
patch
Is there any way we can include
this toaster
Thanks in advance
Hi Shane & all
Computer hosting linux FC4:
IPs: eth0:192.168.1.25(master.mydomain.local)
eth0.1:192.168.1.26(smtp.mydomain.local)
eth0.2:192.168.1.27(imap.mydomain.local)
eth0.3:192.168.1.28(www.mydomain.local)
Toaster Installed: Shupp.org
tcp.smtp:{
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
} (1
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 00:42 -0700, Dimsh wrote:
> Thanks Shane.
>
> The message is sent from telnet or outlook without
> errors BUT
> it Did arrive to its destination when sending from
> outlook (from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] & no smtp auth) but did not
> arrive when sending through telnet...
>
> why
Thanks Shane.
The message is sent from telnet or outlook without
errors BUT
it Did arrive to its destination when sending from
outlook (from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] & no smtp auth) but did not
arrive when sending through telnet...
why is this behaviour ?
--- Shane Chrisp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 00:26 -0700, Dimsh wrote:
> tcp.smtp have the following 3 lines:
>
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> qmailctl cdb
192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
That is why your able to relay without Auth. Its bypassing the smtpauth
and setting the RELAYCLIENT
tcp.smtp have the following 3 lines:
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
qmailctl cdb
--- Shane Chrisp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you add anything to the tcp.smtp file?
>
>
Dimsh
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 00:23 -0700, Dimsh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have successfully installed the Toaster from
> shupp.org, and it works fine and do authenticate well.
>
> but it also accept sending without authentication !
> and this is what I want not to happen.
>
> Through "telnet 192.168.1.x 2
Hi all,
I have successfully installed the Toaster from
shupp.org, and it works fine and do authenticate well.
but it also accept sending without authentication !
and this is what I want not to happen.
Through "telnet 192.168.1.x 25" I can skip the AUTH
process and immediatly issue "MAIL FROM:
[E
yeah, this is correct, i use a empf patch to force authentication, in
local domains
http://www.inter7.com/?page=empf
Em Ter, 2005-07-26 às 14:00 -0300, Carlos Cesario escreveu:
> Hi peoples
>
>
>I'm testing smtp-auth and I don't understand thing.
>I have 2 virtual doamins and when I s
Hi peoples
I'm testing smtp-auth and I don't understand thing.
I have 2 virtual doamins and when I send mail to theses domains the
smtp-auth isn't required, only to external domains the smtp-auth is
required. This is correct ? Exists any mode to enable smtp-auth for all
domains also the my
Nick Gilbert wrote:
PS:
I also have this line in /var/log/maillog
May 16 20:56:23 blue vpopmail[22654]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not
found nick@:127.0.0.1
..which implies that perhaps it's only looking for vpopmail users rather
than /etc/passwd users.
I would like it to work for /etc/passwd u
PS:
I also have this line in /var/log/maillog
May 16 20:56:23 blue vpopmail[22654]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not
found nick@:127.0.0.1
..which implies that perhaps it's only looking for vpopmail users rather
than /etc/passwd users.
I would like it to work for /etc/passwd users only, or both -
Hi,
I have IMAP authentication working for vpop and standard linux users,
but I have a problem with SMTP authentication.
I need SMTP authentication to work for standard linux users (I'm not
worried about vpop users at all). I understand that Bill's toaster
incorporates a Qmail auth patch but wh
Abel Lucano wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Bill Shupp wrote:
Thanks Bill for your quick answer,
Entourage 9 (10) at least seems doesn't like SMTP-AUTH to enable relay.
My provisory workaround is recompile toaster's vpopmail with
--enable-roaming-users
I'm concerned about this scheme: is it just "un-
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Bill Shupp wrote:
> Abel Lucano wrote:
>
> >Hi there,
> >
> >scenario:
> >netqmail 1.05 plus SMTP-AUTH Bill Shupp's patch
> >vpopmail-5.4.8 compiled with just --enable-logging=v
> >
> >Many MAC's mua clients claims that they're unable to Send email
> >"smtp-authenticated"; I'
Abel Lucano wrote:
Hi there,
scenario:
netqmail 1.05 plus SMTP-AUTH Bill Shupp's patch
vpopmail-5.4.8 compiled with just --enable-logging=v
Many MAC's mua clients claims that they're unable to Send email
"smtp-authenticated"; I've noticed that these email clients (Entourage
mainly) makes APOP aut
Hi there,
scenario:
netqmail 1.05 plus SMTP-AUTH Bill Shupp's patch
vpopmail-5.4.8 compiled with just --enable-logging=v
Many MAC's mua clients claims that they're unable to Send email
"smtp-authenticated"; I've noticed that these email clients (Entourage
mainly) makes APOP auth.
Maybe SMTP-AU
> I installed the toaster on a test server and noticed that mail coming
> from authenticated users is not scanned by simscan. I would like to
> scan all outgoing mail for viruses even from authenticated users. Is it
> possible to modify the SMTP-AUTH patch to scan outgoing messages with
> simscan
I installed the toaster on a test server and noticed that mail coming
from authenticated users is not scanned by simscan. I would like to
scan all outgoing mail for viruses even from authenticated users. Is it
possible to modify the SMTP-AUTH patch to scan outgoing messages with
simscan or qm
@shupp.org
Asunto: Re: [toaster] SMTP Auth Doesn't work ??
On Feb 4, 2005, at 6:19 AM, David wrote:
> At the 127.0.0.1 and in the DMZ looks:
>
>
> 220 ESMTP
>
>
>
> But out looks:
>
> 220
>
> It's normal?
No. This has come up before t
On Feb 4, 2005, at 6:19 AM, David wrote:
At the 127.0.0.1 and in the DMZ looks:
220 ESMTP
But out looks:
220
It’s normal?
No. This has come up before though, on this list last November, here's
the answer:
http://www.mail-archive.com/toaster@shupp.org/msg01905.html
You
el: dijous, 3 / febrer / 2005 20:51
Para: toaster@shupp.org
Asunto: Re: [toaster] SMTP Auth Doesn't work ??
To avoid such messages, disable chkuser logs.
This is not the first time I see such message.
It looks like chkuser logs are not directed to log channels, but to smtp
channel
To avoid such messages, disable chkuser logs.
This is not the first time I see such message.
It looks like chkuser logs are not directed to log channels, but to smtp
channel.
I'ld like to understand why with chkuser logs, when working with auth, go
to smtp channel.
Tonino
At 20.25 03/02/2005, y
Hello,
First, excuse my poor English.
I have a problem with the SMTP AUTH.
I think that Ckkuser is not working properly.
I send an email from the same IP segment and no problems.
CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from remote
rcpt : client allowed to relay
CHKUSER rejected relaying: from remote
Thanks Tom, smtp-auth patch upgrade has something about this, released
yesterday. Should be very complex to upgrade this patch on 0.7b3 with
chkusr-mysql? Probably is what I need.
More details on http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
From changelog:
Version 0.51 includes the evaluation of the
On Sep 15, 2004, at 3:42 AM, Eduardo Cortés wrote:
is there any "easy way" to include on logs (qmail-scanner-queue.pl
should be
the better place) the smtp auth information? You can see on logs each
authentication, but in a server with some thousands of accounts,
should be
great to know who authen
hi all,
is there any "easy way" to include on logs (qmail-scanner-queue.pl should be
the better place) the smtp auth information? You can see on logs each
authentication, but in a server with some thousands of accounts, should be
great to know who authenticated user sent what email. qmail-scann
On Aug 27, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
No. Thats wrong. The Auth patch skips the auth-id and uses the user-id
and
the password:
You're right -- I took a closer look.
I also went back to the original message that showed the error was "501
malformed auth input (#5.5.4)". So, it had not
On Aug 10, 2004, at 3:27 PM, Lucas wrote:
What does it means ?. Is the client (thebat) implementing the protocol
incorrectly ?
Not necessarily -- just in a way that's incompatible with the SMTP AUTH
patch.
AUTH PLAIN specifies an authorization id, user id and password. thebat
sends a blank aut
Hi,
It seems Tom is rigth. I try it with outlook and seems to work
like a charm.
Thank you,
Lucas
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 12:27:32 AM, you wrote:
L> Hola Tom,
L> What does it means ?. Is the client (thebat) implementing the protocol
incorrectly ?
L> Thanks,
L>Lucas
L> Tu
Hola Tom,
What does it means ?. Is the client (thebat) implementing the protocol incorrectly ?
Thanks,
Lucas
Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 7:20:18 PM, you wrote:
TC> On Aug 10, 2004, at 1:19 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 004-08-08 19:40:39.658546500 94306 > 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
>> 004-
On Aug 10, 2004, at 1:19 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
004-08-08 19:40:39.658546500 94306 > 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
004-08-08 19:40:39.899217500 94306 < AUTH PLAIN
004-08-08 19:40:39.899534500 94306 > 334
004-08-08 19:40:40.140874500 94306 <
AGx1Y2FzQHZhbGRlb24ubmV0AE1hcmdhcml0YTI0
004-08-08 19:
Hi all
I use FREEBSD's NFS service, in MAILSERVER ,I mount /var/qmail/control & users to
NFS Server.then I use 'make setup check'to setup qmail ,just install instcheck ,error
chown /var/qmail/control error Permission denied, Who can talk me why? Thx
my english is so pool ;-)
Hi,
I recompile all netqmail with vchkusr patch and with
http://shupp.org/patches/netqmail-1.05-tls-smtpauth-20040705.patch
but auth is not working as expected.
I don´t use CRAM because I don´t want to have plaintext passwords in
database, so I want to use auth login plain with tls.
But
004-0
Can anyone explain how SMTP-AUTH works in conjunction with the toaster?
It have SMTP-AUTH working on other servers just fine so I am familiar
with the over concepts. The part that I don't get relative to the
toaster is where/how is user authentication handled? When I give it
the same access in
-Original Message-
From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] SMTP-AUTH does not work for me.
On Jun 30, 2004, at 7:11 PM, John Doe wrote:
> I think that the problem is in some of configuration fi
-Original Message-
From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] SMTP-AUTH does not work for me.
On Jun 30, 2004, at 7:11 PM, John Doe wrote:
> I think that the problem is in some of configuration fi
On Jun 30, 2004, at 7:11 PM, John Doe wrote:
I think that the problem is in some of configuration files, because
when I
remove
from vpopmail defaultdomain file my domain and added my domain in qmail
locals file
the email is not recived to user and log is:
Jul 1 04:43:10 ns qmail: 1088646190.28257
-Original Message-
From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 6:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] SMTP-AUTH does not work for me.
On Jun 30, 2004, at 4:06 AM, John Doe wrote:
> I read lots of documntation in network but nothing about
On Jun 30, 2004, at 4:06 AM, John Doe wrote:
I read lots of documntation in network
but nothing about my problem. I still can send email without
authorization
and qmail-smtpd
does not block these emails.
If you host a.net and you're sending mail to a.net, you don't need to
authenticate.
If you t
scanner-queue.pl"
I read lots of documntation in network
but nothing about my problem. I still can send email without authorization
and qmail-smtpd
does not block these emails.
I think that the problem may be is in configuration because
patch is applayed and compile successful.
Any body can help
Hello,
I installed a new version of netqmail-1.05 with the 'Large Qmail patch' but
SMTP-AUTH isn't working.
I took a new
netqmail-1.05 and only aplied the 'Large qmail patch' without errors.
compiled without errors, installed and started the daemons. There were no
startup errors.
When I try to
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
