On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Andy Drexler wrote:
> Bill -
>
> Thanks for the typically super-explicit instructions. Everything went
> as expected - the server continues to serve mail. Whew!
>
> However, I re-ran the tests from http://spamlart.homeunix.org and got
> the same results (although they do have
Andy Drexler wrote:
I added the host name to the /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file
and re-ran the tests from http://spamlart.homeunix.org and got the
same results (a lot of "Potential Vulnerabilities"). I guess I need to
"grab the 0.5 patch from shupp.org. You'll have to patch a fresh
(Sorry about the dupe here Bill, forgot to remove your address and put
in the list address, but I feel this should be in the thread archives
for future reference so forwarding to list too)
Bill Shupp wrote:
Which version of the toaster and patch worked without the hostname?
Not sure what ver
Bill -
Thanks for the typically super-explicit instructions. Everything went
as expected - the server continues to serve mail. Whew!
However, I re-ran the tests from http://spamlart.homeunix.org and got
the same results (although they do have a caveat that qmail might
produce "false positives"
On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 12:06 PM, Andy Drexler wrote:
Bill, Eero, John -
Thanks very much for the quick, on target replies.
It turns out that the situation with AOL has to do with a reverse-DNS
issue (even though my server has been running for a long long time and
the configuration
Bill, Eero, John -
Thanks very much for the quick, on target replies.
It turns out that the situation with AOL has to do with a reverse-DNS
issue (even though my server has been running for a long long time and
the configuration hasn't changed, they decided to get picky about it
now). Nonethel
On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 11:36 AM, John Melville wrote:
Bill Shupp wrote:
Yes, you are an open relay due to the smtp-auth bug. You are missing
the "hostname" argument to qmail-smtpd. I think that my early
toaster setup was missing this, as it used the old qmail-toaster
patch. Here
On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 11:54 AM, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 14:21, Bill Shupp wrote:
Edit your "run" file, and add your hostname *after* qmail-smtpd,but
before vchkpw. Then restart qmail-smtpd. If that fails, then grab
the
0.5 patch from shupp.org. Y
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 14:21, Bill Shupp wrote:
> Edit your "run" file, and add your hostname *after* qmail-smtpd,but
> before vchkpw. Then restart qmail-smtpd. If that fails, then grab the
> 0.5 patch from shupp.org. You'll have to patch a fresh copy of qmail.
What hostname do I put in ther
Bill Shupp wrote:
Yes, you are an open relay due to the smtp-auth bug. You are missing
the "hostname" argument to qmail-smtpd. I think that my early toaster
setup was missing this, as it used the old qmail-toaster patch.
Here's evidence of my relay test:
Bill is correct, the problem is that
On Thursday, September 25, 2003, at 10:14 AM, Andy Drexler wrote:
I've been running the toaster configuration of qmail for over a year
and it has been great. Yesterday, however, I discovered that AOL had
decided to block my server because, in their words:
Remote host said: 554-(RLY:B1) The in
>
> rcpt to: <"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"@[64.186.170.70]>
> 250 ok
You? Ip 64.186.170.70 is not in open relay list.
Maybe your users sended something to @aol.com and they blocked you out.
--
Eero
12 matches
Mail list logo
