On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Andy Drexler wrote: > Bill - > > Thanks for the typically super-explicit instructions. Everything went > as expected - the server continues to serve mail. Whew! > > However, I re-ran the tests from http://spamlart.homeunix.org and got > the same results (although they do have a caveat that qmail might > produce "false positives". I also re-ran the relay test from www.abuse > net and passed all the tests except one: > > "Relay test 6 > > >>> RSET > <<< 250 flushed > >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <<< 250 ok > >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <<< 250 ok > >>> DATA > <<< 354 go ahead > >>> (message body) > <<< 250 ok 1064604415 qp 28830 > > > Relay test result > Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay." > > is this something I should be concerned about? > > Thanks again for tremendous help!! > > Andy >
Hi Andy, many 'abuse-test' are weak designed, and bring false positives with Qmail Take a look to: http://homepages.tesco.net./~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/maps-relay-test-is-wrong.html regards ------------------------------------ Abel Lucano DECODE SA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
