[TLS] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-cached-info-20: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-cached-info-20: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [TLS] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests-07: (with COMMENT)

> > — Section 1.1 — > > Please use the exact BCP 14 boilerplate from RFC 8174 (this one is missing > > “BCP 14”). > > Eagle eye! I would like to propose that we leave this one to the RFC editor. Sure; maybe Ben can stick in an RFC Editor note to make sure they notice it. Thanks, Barry _

Re: [TLS] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-05: (with COMMENT)

> --Section 3.3 -- > Probably worth expanding "DOS" at first use. Actually, "DoS" (with the small "o") is in the RFC Editor's list of abbreviations that do not need to be expanded. That, of course, doesn't mean that it *shouldn't* be expanded. But it should be spelled with the small "o", in any

Re: [TLS] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk-03: (with COMMENT)

Thanks, Russ. And, yes, my comment about knowing when the experiment is over and what the results are... was something of a rant, and I agree that I can't think of anything useful to say. Sigh. Anyway, thanks for addressing my comments. Barry On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 1:11 PM Russ Housley wrote

[TLS] Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-11

Perfect; thanks so much! Barry On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 2:46 PM Sean Turner wrote: > > On Mar 17, 2025, at 7:21 AM, Barry Leiba via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Barry Leiba > Review result: Ready with Nits > > This document is in good shape and does what it n

[TLS] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests-07: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

[TLS] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[TLS] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-05: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

[TLS] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk-03: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however

[TLS] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech-06

Reviewer: Barry Leiba Review result: Ready with Nits Just two small comments on this straightforward document: — Section 3 — Figure 1: ECH SvcParam with a public_name of "ech-sites.example.com" The example actually encodes example.net, not example.com [This was a test to see if we c

[TLS] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-11

Reviewer: Barry Leiba Review result: Ready with Nits This document is in good shape and does what it needs to do. I have just one very minor substantive comment, and two very nitty nits: — Section 3.1 — If the "Recommended" column is set to "D" the item is discourag