Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-cached-info-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-cached-info/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have two comments about Section 8.2: 1. The Standards Action range starts at 0, and you've assigned 1 and 2, but not 0. Is it intended that 0 should remain reserved and unassigned? If so, you should say that. 2. For the Specification Required range, is there any guidance you can/should give to the designated expert? What do you expect the DE to look for when evaluating requests? Why might the DE not approve a request? _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
