Perfect; thanks so much! Barry
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 2:46 PM Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > On Mar 17, 2025, at 7:21 AM, Barry Leiba via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > wrote: > > Reviewer: Barry Leiba > Review result: Ready with Nits > > This document is in good shape and does what it needs to do. I have just > one > very minor substantive comment, and two very nitty nits: > > — Section 3.1 — > > If the > "Recommended" column is set to "D" the item is discouraged and > SHOULD NOT or MUST NOT be used. > > That seems a little odd, and I wonder whether some readers of the note (who > don’t look here for the definition of “D”) might be confused about whether > it’s > SHOULD NOT or MUST NOT. Perhaps this?: > > NEW-1 > If the "Recommended" column is set to "D" the item is discouraged and > SHOULD > NOT or MUST NOT be used; consult the item’s references to understand the > situation. END > > …or maybe… > > NEW-2 > If the "Recommended" column is set to "D" the item is discouraged and > SHOULD > NOT or MUST NOT be used, depending upon the situation; consult the item’s > references for clarity. END > > > Fixed via: https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/72/files > <https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/7/files> > > — Section 3 — > > Nit in the definition of “N”: “leave an items” -> “leave an item”. > > > Fixed via: https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/70/files > > Also “basis of it having” -> “basis of its having”, as standard practice > uses > possessive pronouns with gerunds. > > > Fixed via: https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/72/files > <https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/7/files> > > Cheers, > spt >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
