Hi Tiru,
Thanks for the review. I've filed it as
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech/issues/21.
1. I've opened a PR to add examples:
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech/pull/22
2. This text was heavily debated in DNSOP:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zOx
This might be of interest to some.
-- Forwarded message -
From: 'Moody, Dustin (Fed)' via pqc-forum
Date: Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Subject: [pqc-forum] Recommendations for Key-Encapsulation Mechanisms |
Draft SP 800-227 is Available for Comment
To: pqc-forum
The initial publ
2025-01-07 14:16 GMT+01:00 John Mattsson
:
> Alicja Kario wrote:
> >Can you point to examples of people actually using x448 (TLS group ID 30) in
> >practice?
>
> I think that is the wrong question.
If no one deployed X448 I don't see why they would deploy X448MLKEM1024, so I
see no reason to
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 17:16, John Mattsson wrote:
>
> Alicja Kario wrote:
> >Can you point to examples of people actually using x448 (TLS group ID 30) in
> >practice?
>
>
>
> I think that is the wrong question. I think the right question is which
> hybrids do IETF recommend people to use in the
Alicja Kario wrote:
>Can you point to examples of people actually using x448 (TLS group ID 30) in
>practice?
I think that is the wrong question. I think the right question is which hybrids
do IETF recommend people to use in the future. I think the answer is hybrids
with X25519, X448, Ed25519, a
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 17:35, Filippo Valsorda wrote:
>
> 2025-01-07 14:16 GMT+01:00 John Mattsson
> :
>
> Alicja Kario wrote:
> >Can you point to examples of people actually using x448 (TLS group ID 30) in
> >practice?
>
>
>
> I think that is the wrong question.
>
>
> If no one deployed X448 I d
How about having x448mlkem1024 allocated as an experimental codepoint
for those who
wish to use it ?
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 12:52, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 08:00:04AM +, Kris Kwiatkowski wrote:
> > On 06/01/2025 06:18, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > > it would be very un
Hi Michael,
> TL;DR> Help us avoid stuffing non-DNS strings into
>SubjectAltName dNSName when doing device to device (D)TLS.
I may fail to understandiung your question or intention.
Maybe you clarify it.
Your initial question in "draft-tls13-iot" was:
"I was looking for a SN, or SAN th
(I originally proposed PR that added that codepoint, together with the
secp384r1mlkem1024, so I'm really not against it, but...)
Can you point to examples of people actually using x448 (TLS group ID 30)
in
practice?
If you want to experiment, then there's the whole private range, what would
ma
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 9:31 PM Watson Ladd wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 6:14 PM Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 11:31 AM Michael Richardson <
> mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Please note and respect the Reply-To: u...@ietf.org.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 4.
10 matches
Mail list logo
