(I originally proposed PR that added that codepoint, together with the
secp384r1mlkem1024, so I'm really not against it, but...)
Can you point to examples of people actually using x448 (TLS group ID 30)
in
practice?
If you want to experiment, then there's the whole private range, what would
making a public ID add to that experiment?
On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 10:01:20 CET, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
How about having x448mlkem1024 allocated as an experimental codepoint
for those who
wish to use it ?
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 12:52, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 08:00:04AM +0000, Kris Kwiatkowski wrote: ...
--
Regards,
Alicja (nee Hubert) Kario
Principal Quality Engineer, RHEL Crypto team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
