It looks like we have consensus for this strategy. We’ll work to remove
codepoints from draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design and then get experimental
codepoints allocated based on draft-tls-westerbaan-xyber768d00.
Best,
Chris, for the chairs
> On Mar 28, 2023, at 9:49 PM, Christopher Wood wrote:
>
This WG adoption call has ended. There is consensus to adopt this I-D as a WG
item.
Authors: Please submit a WG version when you get the chance.
Cheers,
spt
> On Mar 28, 2023, at 00:54, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> At TLS@IETF116, the sense of the room was that there was WG support to adopt
> draf
> On Apr 11, 2023, at 12:50, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
> I am commenting on 8447bis. This document is just about ready to move
> forward, but two fixes are needed.
>
> Why there are Notes still in the doc (e.g., near end of section 6 it says
> about weaker elliptic curves) and think those should b
Thanks for the info.
>This tweak was introduced as a result of discussions in Philly (IETF115) to
>address David Schinazi’s comment at the mic. If I remember correctly, the
>discussion was that there’s not really a concern about exhausting the registry
>space because it’s a “string" registry, b
