It looks like we have consensus for this strategy. We’ll work to remove 
codepoints from draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design and then get experimental 
codepoints allocated based on draft-tls-westerbaan-xyber768d00.

Best,
Chris, for the chairs 

> On Mar 28, 2023, at 9:49 PM, Christopher Wood <c...@heapingbits.net> wrote:
> 
> As discussed during yesterday's meeting, we would like to assess consensus 
> for moving draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design forward with the following strategy 
> for allocating codepoints we can use in deployments.
> 
> 1. Remove codepoints from draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design and advance this 
> document through the process towards publication.
> 2. Write a simple -00 draft that specifies the target variant of 
> X25519+Kyber768 with a codepoint from the standard ranges. (Bas helpfully did 
> this for us already [1].) Once this is complete, request a codepoint from 
> IANA using the standard procedure.
> 
> The intent of this proposal is to get us a codepoint that we can deploy today 
> without putting a "draft codepoint" in an eventual RFC.
> 
> Please let us know if you support this proposal by April 18, 2023. Assuming 
> there is rough consensus, we will move forward with this proposal.
> 
> Best,
> Chris, Joe, and Sean
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tls-westerbaan-xyber768d00-00

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to