RFC 8874 describes several different methods for using GitHub, ranging from the
lightweight "document management mode" [1] to more heavyweight "issue
discussion mode" [2]. Most TLS documents are hosted and worked on in GitHub,
though with varying levels of interaction. For example, some interact
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:51 PM Christopher Wood
wrote:
>
> We'd like to hear whether folks are support or oppose this proposal.
> Please chime in (on the list!) and share your thoughts before November 4.
> We'll determine whether there is consensus to adopt this new approach
> moving forward at
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:51 PM Christopher Wood
wrote:
> RFC 8874 describes several different methods for using GitHub, ranging
> from the lightweight "document management mode" [1] to more heavyweight
> "issue discussion mode" [2]. Most TLS documents are hosted and worked on in
> GitHub, though
I support this proposal. GitHub offers a lot more tools for organization than
emails do, which makes reviewing issues considerably easier.
> On Oct 21, 2020, at 3:51 PM, Christopher Wood wrote:
>
> RFC 8874 describes several different methods for using GitHub, ranging from
> the lightweight "
+1, issue discussion mode with email summaries sounds like the best option
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 4:08 PM Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:51 PM Christopher Wood
> wrote:
>
>> RFC 8874 describes several different methods for using GitHub, ranging
>> from the lightweight "do
I can live with it :)
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020, at 10:04, Rob Sayre wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:51 PM Christopher Wood wrote:
> >
> > We'd like to hear whether folks are support or oppose this proposal. Please
> > chime in (on the list!) and share your thoughts before November 4. We'll
> > determine whether there
Hi,
I used to be very active in the development of TLS
specifications (version 1.2) and some of the extensions.
At the time, all discussion was done on the mailing list.
I don't know if I'll be active going forward, but the
trend to move everything to GitHub is a mistake, in my
opinion.
Firs
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020, Christopher Wood wrote:
> We'd like to hear whether folks are support or oppose this proposal.
Opposed.
I want to use my tools to follow a discussion,
not something someone else controls/"designs".
--
Address is valid for this mailing list only, please do not reply
to it d
