+1, issue discussion mode with email summaries sounds like the best option On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 4:08 PM Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:51 PM Christopher Wood <c...@heapingbits.net> > wrote: > >> RFC 8874 describes several different methods for using GitHub, ranging >> from the lightweight "document management mode" [1] to more heavyweight >> "issue discussion mode" [2]. Most TLS documents are hosted and worked on in >> GitHub, though with varying levels of interaction. For example, some >> interact with GitHub in "issue tracking mode," wherein editors primarily >> use GitHub for tracking open issues. Others interact with GitHub in a way >> that resembles "issue discussion mode," wherein substantive issue >> discussion takes place on GitHub issues and consensus calls occur on the >> list. >> >> This discrepancy has caused confusion in the past, especially with >> respect to how best to stay engaged in the continued development of WG >> documents. Moreover, with the rising rate at which other WGs and IETF >> participants adopt GitHub for document development, especially those formed >> in recent years, we have not made expectations for use of GitHub clear. >> >> To that end, after observing what's been maximally productive for >> document development in TLS and related WGs, taking into account community >> engagement, document review support, and editor tools, we propose the >> following: the TLS WG interact with WG documents in "issue discussion >> mode," following the approach outlined in [3]. >> >> We'd like to hear whether folks are support or oppose this proposal. >> Please chime in (on the list!) and share your thoughts before November 4. >> We'll determine whether there is consensus to adopt this new approach >> moving forward at that time. >> > > I am in favor of using "issue discussion mode". When we developed our > current structure, we had less experience with Github and it was reasonable > to be cautious, but I believe that now we have enough experience to support > the use of "issue discussion mode". > > -Ekr > > >> Thanks, >> Chris, on behalf of the chairs >> >> [1] https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc8874.html#name-document-management-mode >> [2] https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc8874.html#name-issue-labeling-schemes >> [3] https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc8874.html#name-issue-discussion-mode >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
