On Thu, Oct 22, 2020, at 10:04, Rob Sayre wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:51 PM Christopher Wood <c...@heapingbits.net> wrote: > > > > We'd like to hear whether folks are support or oppose this proposal. Please > > chime in (on the list!) and share your thoughts before November 4. We'll > > determine whether there is consensus to adopt this new approach moving > > forward at that time.
This is a fine plan. > I support this "issue discussion mode" as long as summaries are sent to > the list (as they are now). My github account is too noisy to be > useful. I think that Rob's request is reasonable. And I hope that this isn't just the digests, which I find useless. Either way, even when discussing issues, it's often good to open a thread on the list for important topics. On this point, I regard the ECH work as being effectively a self-selected design team. I have been unable to keep tracking the work and lack the context to engage on the topics that do come back to the list for discussion. Missing 3am meetings can't have helped, but it's mostly about the volume of traffic. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
