Dear all,
A new version of draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc has been updated to
data tracker.
You can download it with following link:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-09.txt.
We have updated the draft based on the comments received from mailing list and
f
This is the working group last call for the "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1”
draft available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate/
Please review the document and send your comments to the list by April 26, 2019.
Thanks,
Chris, Joe, and Sean
___
At TLS@IETF104, there was interest in the room to adopt
draft-sy-tls-resumption-group as a WG item. The draft can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sy-tls-resumption-group/
This email starts the call for adoption. It will run until April 26, 2019.
Please indicate whether
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019, 4:28 PM Christopher Wood wrote:
> This is the working group last call for the "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and
> TLSv1.1” draft available at:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate/
>
> Please review the document and send your comments to the l
I like the basic idea, but I don't think that this is the right solution. I
realize that we can adopt and fix, but I my preference is to have a little more
time to discuss solutions before we adopt anything.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019, at 09:35, Christopher Wood wrote:
> At TLS@IETF104, there was int
Section 1.1 doesn't say *how* those listed documents are updated. Might pay to
include a few works on how.
Section 2 can be cut down a lot. The quote from another document is longer
than the rest of the text. In many ways, saying that the IETF is moving last
is not a great thing to memoriali
