I like the basic idea, but I don't think that this is the right solution. I realize that we can adopt and fix, but I my preference is to have a little more time to discuss solutions before we adopt anything.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019, at 09:35, Christopher Wood wrote: > At TLS@IETF104, there was interest in the room to adopt > draft-sy-tls-resumption-group as a WG item. The draft can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sy-tls-resumption-group/ > > This email starts the call for adoption. It will run until April 26, > 2019. Please indicate whether or not you would like to see this draft > adopted. > > Thanks, > Chris, Joe, and Sean > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
