Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

The adoption call is now complete. Thanks to everyone who chimed in! It seems we have consensus to adopt this draft as a WG item. Ekr, can you please submit draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446-bis-00 when convenient? Thanks, Chris, on behalf of the chairs On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, at 9:17 AM, Christopher Wood wr

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

I support adoption of this work. B. > On Sep 2, 2020, at 6:18 PM, Christopher Wood wrote: > > This email begins the adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis. As > mentioned [1], this updates language and fixes some errata against RFC8446 > (as identified below). No other semantic chan

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:21 PM Salz, Rich wrote: > > I support this and will help work on it. > I also support adoption. > ___ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls ___

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

I support adoption. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 9:32 PM Christopher Patton wrote: > I support adoption. > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:17 PM Richard Barnes wrote: > >> I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG. >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, S

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

I support adoption. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:17 PM Richard Barnes wrote: > I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG. > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi >> wrote: >> >>> I support adoption and am willing to

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi > wrote: > >> I support adoption and am willing to help review. >> >> In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: >>

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi wrote: > I support adoption and am willing to help review. > > In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: > > https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00 > Thanks. I a

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

I support adoption and am willing to help review. In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00 David On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM Ben Smyth wrote: > I support adoption

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

I support adoption and I am willing to help work on this. (Eric has already incorporated many of my suggestions, many thanks for that.) ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

I support adoption on this. Yes, I'll assist in reviews, etc. tim On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:18 PM Christopher Wood wrote: > This email begins the adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis. As > mentioned [1], this updates language and fixes some errata against RFC8446 > (as identified

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

Unsurprisingly, I support adoption. My hope here is that we can quickly flush out remaining issues that could cause confusion and get this to the IESG. -Ekr On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 9:20 AM Salz, Rich wrote: > I support this and will help work on it. > > _

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

I support this and will help work on it. ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls