I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi <dschinazi.i...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I support adoption and am willing to help review. >> >> In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00 >> > > Thanks. I attempted to backport all the substantive changes made in RPC > processing. However, there are a number of places (tables, line breaks, > etc.) where the formatter behaved differently. In addition, some of the > references are different because of differences between > kramdown2629/xml2rfc's automatic reference processing and how the RPC does > things. If you find changes you believe are material, please send PRs. > > -Ekr > > David >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM Ben Smyth <resea...@bensmyth.com> wrote: >> >>> I support adoption and I am willing to help work on this. (Eric has >>> already incorporated many of my suggestions, many thanks for that.) >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> TLS mailing list >>> >>> >>> TLS@ietf.org >>> >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> TLS mailing list >> >> >> TLS@ietf.org >> >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > > TLS mailing list > > TLS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
