I support adoption. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:17 PM Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG. > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I support adoption and am willing to help review. >>> >>> In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: >>> >>> https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00 >>> >> >> Thanks. I attempted to backport all the substantive changes made in RPC >> processing. However, there are a number of places (tables, line breaks, >> etc.) where the formatter behaved differently. In addition, some of the >> references are different because of differences between >> kramdown2629/xml2rfc's automatic reference processing and how the RPC does >> things. If you find changes you believe are material, please send PRs. >> >> -Ekr >> >> David >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM Ben Smyth <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I support adoption and I am willing to help work on this. (Eric has >>>> already incorporated many of my suggestions, many thanks for that.) >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> >>>> TLS mailing list >>>> >>>> >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> TLS mailing list >>> >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> TLS mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> >> _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
