> On Oct 25, 2024, at 10:52, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
> I mean "IANA cannot have designated..."
>
> I blame auto-correct. Or outlook. Anyone other than me.
>
> On 10/25/24, 10:50 AM, "Salz, Rich" wrote:
>
>> The following PR creates the TLS Flags sub-registry where we can manage the
>> actua
I mean "IANA cannot have designated..."
I blame auto-correct. Or outlook. Anyone other than me.
On 10/25/24, 10:50 AM, "Salz, Rich" wrote:
> The following PR creates the TLS Flags sub-registry where we can manage the
> actual flags. I asserted that the chairs control adding values, which wo
> The following PR creates the TLS Flags sub-registry where we can manage the
> actual flags. I asserted that the chairs control adding values, which won’t
> be true once (and if) the registry goes to IANA (it’ll be the DEs: Rich,
> Nick, and Yoav), and populated the 1st value from the draft:
>
Hi! The chairs have judged that there is consensus to request an early code
point for this draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags. I will send a message to the DEs and
IANA to get this code point assigned.
The following PR creates the TLS Flags sub-registry where we can manage the
actual flags. I asserted tha
>We (the Chairs) would like to determine whether there is consensus to request
>an early code point >request for "tls_flags” in the TLS ExtensionType Values
>registry registry; see Section 4 of the I-D [0]. The >point of this consensus
>call is to determine whether you think this I-D is stable e
I support this as well. As an implementer interested in providing an
implementation, I would like to help progress draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags, but
I cannot do so without a codepoint, so this seems necessary to break the
deadlock.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 3:03 PM Bas Westerbaan wrote:
> I support thi
I support this.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 9:00 PM Sean Turner wrote:
> Hi! We paused progression of draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags until we had
> implementations. We (the chairs) have gotten requests for an early IANA
> code point; if you remember draft-ietf-tls-cross-sni-resumption, a WG I-D
> that is n
