I support this. On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 9:00 PM Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> Hi! We paused progression of draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags until we had > implementations. We (the chairs) have gotten requests for an early IANA > code point; if you remember draft-ietf-tls-cross-sni-resumption, a WG I-D > that is now expired, and draft-jhoyla-req-mtls-flag, a individual I-D, > would both need this code point. Note that like draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc, > draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags also creates a new sub-registry, but IANA cannot > create a temporary registry and then manage it for us. We will do that in > the WG/I-D; there is not much to manage because at this point it’s only two > values. With that said …. > > We (the Chairs) would like to determine whether there is consensus to > request an early code point request for "tls_flags” in the TLS > ExtensionType Values registry registry; see Section 4 of the I-D [0]. The > point of this consensus call is to determine whether you think this I-D is > stable enough to request a code point from the DEs. Please let the list > know by 11 October 2024 if you support this request. > > Cheers, > spt > (as TLS Co-Chair) > > [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags/ > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
