I already have a conflict for this, so I will not be attending.
-Ekr
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Darin Pettis wrote:
> Sean - thank you for the update and options on rooms.
>
> Ben and Brett - which room should we meet in?
>
> Initially opposed to encrypting SNI as it appears to break man
Sean - thank you for the update and options on rooms.
Ben and Brett - which room should we meet in?
Initially opposed to encrypting SNI as it appears to break many services
that utilize it but curious to hear more. Thx
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:17 AM Christian Huitema
wrote:
> On 11/12/2017
On 11/12/2017 4:54 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> Hi! I applaud the initiative for suggesting the hangout [0]. Squatting in
> that room ought to be okay but in case the secretariat ends up scheduling
> another IETF session in that room the 12 person room (Butterworth) is still
> available during th
Hi! I applaud the initiative for suggesting the hangout [0]. Squatting in
that room ought to be okay but in case the secretariat ends up scheduling
another IETF session in that room the 12 person room (Butterworth) is still
available during that time:
https://www.ietf.org/registration/MeetingW
All,
Since the TLS session on Monday got canceled what would people think about
using that time to talk about encrypted SNI?
Bret
Sent from my Commodore 128D
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050___
TLS mailing list
T
