Hi! I applaud the initiative for suggesting the hangout [0]. Squatting in that room ought to be okay but in case the secretariat ends up scheduling another IETF session in that room the 12 person room (Butterworth) is still available during that time: https://www.ietf.org/registration/MeetingWiki/wiki/doku.php?id=100sidemeetings2 It can be scheduled through the following link: https://ietf.org/meeting/amreq.html
Cheers, spt [0] For those more process oriented folks, Ben and Bret correctly identified this as a hangout. it’s not a WG session that got canceled. > On Nov 12, 2017, at 22:16, Ben Schwartz <bem...@google.com> wrote: > > Let's meet in the room TLS would have had (Padang) for an informal discussion > about encrypted SNI. > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Bret Jordan <jordan2...@gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > Since the TLS session on Monday got canceled what would people think about > using that time to talk about encrypted SNI? > > Bret > > Sent from my Commodore 128D > > PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050 > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
