Sean - thank you for the update and options on rooms. Ben and Brett - which room should we meet in?
Initially opposed to encrypting SNI as it appears to break many services that utilize it but curious to hear more. Thx On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:17 AM Christian Huitema <huit...@huitema.net> wrote: > On 11/12/2017 4:54 PM, Sean Turner wrote: > > > Hi! I applaud the initiative for suggesting the hangout [0]. Squatting > in that room ought to be okay but in case the secretariat ends up > scheduling another IETF session in that room the 12 person room > (Butterworth) is still available during that time: > > > https://www.ietf.org/registration/MeetingWiki/wiki/doku.php?id=100sidemeetings2 > > It can be scheduled through the following link: > > https://ietf.org/meeting/amreq.html > > > > Cheers, > > > > spt > > > > [0] For those more process oriented folks, Ben and Bret correctly > identified this as a hangout. it’s not a WG session that got canceled. > > > > The SNI Encryption draft is maintained on the TLS WG Github, at > https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption. It would be really nice if after > or during the discussions someone opened issues and possibly PR. > > Thanks, and sorry I could not join you in Singapore > > -- Christian Huitema > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
