On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:21:49PM -0400, Sean Turner wrote:
> I think we can safely mark this one HFDU (Hold For Document Update).
Indeed, and done.
Thanks everybody!
-Ben
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
I think we can safely mark this one HFDU (Hold For Document Update).
spt
> On Aug 17, 2018, at 02:29, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
> I would also remove the spurious paren instead -- having a MUST NOT
> inside a paren seems suboptimal to me.
>
> /Simon
>
> fre 2018-08-17 klockan 14:09 +1000 skrev
I would also remove the spurious paren instead -- having a MUST NOT
inside a paren seems suboptimal to me.
/Simon
fre 2018-08-17 klockan 14:09 +1000 skrev Martin Thomson:
> Looks good. I would remove the trailing paren instead though.
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:08 PM RFC Errata System
> wrote
Looks good. I would remove the trailing paren instead though.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:08 PM RFC Errata System
wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8422,
> "Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security
> (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8422,
"Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5466
-
