I think we can safely mark this one HFDU (Hold For Document Update). spt
> On Aug 17, 2018, at 02:29, Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: > > I would also remove the spurious paren instead -- having a MUST NOT > inside a paren seems suboptimal to me. > > /Simon > > fre 2018-08-17 klockan 14:09 +1000 skrev Martin Thomson: >> Looks good. I would remove the trailing paren instead though. >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:08 PM RFC Errata System >> <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote: >>> >>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8422, >>> "Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport >>> Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier". >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> You may review the report below and at: >>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5466 >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Type: Editorial >>> Reported by: Masato Gosui <mgo...@yahoo-corp.jp> >>> >>> Section: 5.3 >>> >>> Original Text >>> ------------- >>> Actions of the sender: >>> >>> The server constructs an appropriate certificate chain and >>> conveys it >>> to the client in the Certificate message. If the client has >>> used a >>> Supported Elliptic Curves Extension, the public key in the >>> server's >>> certificate MUST respect the client's choice of elliptic >>> curves. A >>> server that cannot satisfy this requirement MUST NOT choose an >>> ECC >>> cipher suite in its ServerHello message.) >>> >>> Corrected Text >>> -------------- >>> Actions of the sender: >>> >>> The server constructs an appropriate certificate chain and >>> conveys it >>> to the client in the Certificate message. If the client has >>> used a >>> Supported Elliptic Curves Extension, the public key in the >>> server's >>> certificate MUST respect the client's choice of elliptic >>> curves. (A >>> server that cannot satisfy this requirement MUST NOT choose an >>> ECC >>> cipher suite in its ServerHello message.) >>> >>> Notes >>> ----- >>> This adds the missing opening parenthesis of the last sentence of >>> the "Actions of the sender" paragraph. >>> >>> Instructions: >>> ------------- >>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, >>> please >>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> RFC8422 (draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-17) >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Title : Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher >>> Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier >>> Publication Date : August 2018 >>> Author(s) : Y. Nir, S. Josefsson, M. Pegourie-Gonnard >>> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >>> Source : Transport Layer Security >>> Area : Security >>> Stream : IETF >>> Verifying Party : IESG >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TLS mailing list >>> TLS@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
