I personally have no intention of making this PS (or to otherwise water down
recommendations against it).
I do have some interest in doing what can be done to make this less of a
hazard. You will see that I took John's suggest to more directly proscribe its
use: https://github.com/martinthomso
> If there were some technical means to ensure that this was less likely to be
> abused, I'd like it more.
Perhaps require key update prior to secrets export😊
-Original Message-
From: TLS On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 2:20 PM
To: Sean Turner ; TLS List
Sub
Does an Informational draft require WG adoption? If the goal isn't to switch to
the Standards track, I have no concerns.
Cheers,
Andrei
-Original Message-
From: TLS On Behalf Of Ilari Liusvaara
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 11:11 AM
To: TLS List
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [TLS] Call fo
