Does an Informational draft require WG adoption? If the goal isn't to switch to the Standards track, I have no concerns.
Cheers, Andrei -----Original Message----- From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Ilari Liusvaara Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 11:11 AM To: TLS List <tls@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [TLS] Call for adoption of draft-thomson-tls-keylogfile On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 07:02:20PM +0000, Andrei Popov wrote: > > I oppose adoption of draft-thomson-tls-keylogfile. The stated goal was > to find a permanent, discoverable location for this document, other > than NSS project's repository. Perhaps it's fine to create an RFC for > this purpose, but then I'd argue that it should be an Informational > RFC. The I-D has: "Intended status: Informational" (for some reason the datatracker is unable to determine this). -Ilari _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ftls&data=05%7C01%7CAndrei.Popov%40microsoft.com%7C4d4695c5433c4186eed608dad17465a9%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638052595136932049%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0WqfX2eGL7cXMwCbYEOegEEnpRNXtdyFcDC3QBjMOe8%3D&reserved=0 _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
