> If there were some technical means to ensure that this was less likely to be > abused, I'd like it more. Perhaps require key update prior to secrets export😊
-----Original Message----- From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 2:20 PM To: Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com>; TLS List <tls@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [TLS] Call for adoption of draft-thomson-tls-keylogfile I'm ok with adoption so long as we include sufficient caveats along the way (and then add more caveats just in case:-) If there were some technical means to ensure that this was less likely to be abused, I'd like it more. (Could we e.g. require inclusion of a TLS extension that has a 100kB cat-picture payload?) S. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
