Hi TLS co-chairs,
I support adoption.
Regards,
Quynh.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 12:09 AM Loganaden Velvindron
wrote:
> I share the same view as Martin. I also support adoption but we should
> be very careful proceeding forward.
>
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 05:00, Martin Thomson wrote:
> >
> > Like
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 6:31 PM Watson Ladd wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025, 3:15 PM Quynh Dang wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 1:27 PM Tim Hollebeek
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Consensus has nothing to do with number of votes.
>>>
is, in general.
>
> And I say this even though I’ve been in the rough quite a few times😊
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andrei
>
>
>
> *From:* Quynh Dang
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2025 11:16 AM
> *To:* Andrei Popov
> *Cc:* Tim Bray ; tls@ie
> hasn’t been achieved, please feel free to publicly or privately reach out
> to a chair or area director.
>
>
> -Tim
>
>
>
> *From:* Quynh Dang
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2025 1:04 PM
> *To:* Ted Lemon
> *Cc:* tls@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [TLS] Re:
WG chair discretion
> in determining consensus; I believe the chairs are doing a good job of
> this, in general.
>
And I say this even though I’ve been in the rough quite a few times😊
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andrei
>
>
>
> *From:* Quynh Dang
> *Sen
ers,
>
>
>
> Andrei
>
>
>
> *From:* Quynh Dang
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2025 11:01 AM
> *To:* Andrei Popov
> *Cc:* Tim Bray ; tls@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [EXTERNAL] [TLS] Re: Changing WG Mail List Reputation
>
>
>
> You don't
and I don't think we should talk about
it now.
Regards,
Quynh.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andrei
>
>
>
> *From:* Quynh Dang
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2025 10:44 AM
> *To:* Tim Bray
> *Cc:* tls@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [TLS] Re: Changi
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 1:26 PM Tim Bray wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2025 at 11:37:58 AM, Quynh Dang wrote:
>
> Defining a minimum percentage of votes to have the consensus would take
>> care of the problem and the chairs at the IETF would love that.
>>
>
> No it woul
r than defining a minimum
percentage of votes to have the consensus.
Regards,
Quynh.
> If there really is no better reason to choose solution A as opposed to
> solution B as the number of votes, then the decision is effectively
> arbitrary anyway, and a coin flip would also work (and th
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 11:40 AM D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> Quynh Dang writes:
> > D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> > > Quynh Dang writes:
> > > > Any result will hurt one group (can't be both groups have what they
> > > > want).
> > > BCP 54: &
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 9:42 AM D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> Quynh Dang writes:
> > Any result will hurt one group (can't be both groups have what they
> > want).
>
> BCP 54: "IETF participants use their best engineering judgment to find
> the best solution for the
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 2:57 PM Bob Beck wrote:
>
>
> > On Jan 14, 2025, at 12:20 PM, Dang, Quynh H. (Fed) 40nist@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe consensus calls can only be made and completed at the in-person
> meetings ?
>
> The problem with in-person (or even virtual at the in-perso
;
> -Ekr
>
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Quynh Dang wrote:
>
>> Are you worried about 2^96 precomputation and the risk of 1/2^32 of
>> cracking your key?
>>
>> Quynh.
>> On May 24, 2016 3:05 PM, "Eric Rescorla" wrote:
>>
>>&
Are you worried about 2^96 precomputation and the risk of 1/2^32 of
cracking your key?
Quynh.
On May 24, 2016 3:05 PM, "Eric Rescorla" wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Dang, Quynh (Fed)
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 5/24/16, 2:42 PM, "Martin Thomson" wrote:
>>
>> >On 24 May 2016 at 10:4
Hi Eric and Watson,
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 7 Nov 2015, at 11:39 AM, Dave Garrett
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Friday, November 06, 2015 08:13:44 pm Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> >> Update: we discussed this e
Hi John,
Sha384 in the ciphersuite is the hash function to be used in hmac, not
signatures, and the security of this hmac depends on the strenght of the
hmac key and the tag size.
Regards,
Quynh.
On Oct 12, 2015 12:50 PM, "John Mattsson"
wrote:
> The statement i [1] is about AES, and is very tr
16 matches
Mail list logo
