Sigh! You are of course correct!
Thanks,
Ketan
On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 4:13 PM Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025, at 19:01, Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker wrote:
> > In Section 2.2. - note that draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis changed "master" to
> > "main&
Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Hi Eric,
I may be losing track of the conversations since the draft update has not
yet been posted. I am responding only to the points that you have raised
below.
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 9:16 PM Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:15 AM Ketan Talaulikar via Da
es to this document, except
> for the following registrations:” or something along those lines, although
> we generally prefer that any detailed instructions to applicants or
> designated experts be carried over.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amanda
>
>
>
> *From: *"Sa
IANA has done whatever it has to do;
> if there is some confusion on the IANA side, I think it would be better
> to clarify that out of band.
>
> -Ekr
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:15 AM Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Ke
Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
*Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 12:30 PM
> *To: *Salz, Rich
> *Cc: *Ketan Talaulikar , The IESG ,
> draft-ietf-tls-tls12-fro...@ietf.org ,
> tls-cha...@ietf.org , tls@ietf.org ,
> s...@sn3rd.com
> *Subject: *Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-
>
>
> KT> Suggest:
>
>
>
> Work on post-quantum cryptography for TLS 1.2 MUST NOT be undertaken (see
> Section 4) in the IETF and anyone wishing to deploy post-quantum
> cryptography is expected to use TLS 1.3 (or newer).
>
>
>
> I don’t like this rephrasing. MUST NOT is stronger to me, than saying
Hi Rich,
Please check inline below for response with KT where I have included some
suggestions:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 2:56 AM Salz, Rich wrote:
> Thank you for the review.
>
>
>
>
> 1) Section 1
>
> "This document specifies that outside of urgent security fixes, and the
> exceptions listed i
Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
10 matches
Mail list logo
