Hi Eric,

I may be losing track of the conversations since the draft update has not
yet been posted. I am responding only to the points that you have raised
below.


On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 9:16 PM Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:15 AM Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> 2) Please state in the introduction section on what part of 8422 is being
>> updated by this document.
>>
>
> I'm actually not sure it does. I'll start a separate thread.
>
>
>
>>
>> 4) Ref section 1.4 - does this document also not update RFC7627 with its
>> terminology change?
>>
>
> I'm not sure I understand this question.
>

KT> Please add a sentence in the last paragraph of Section 1 to indicate
that the document updates RFC7627 with change in its terminology to remove
the use of "master". Or something like that.

Thanks,
Ketan


>
>
>>
>> 6) I believe there is an error with the reference to RFC8444. That one is
>> a
>> OSPF routing protocol extension and don't see how that comes into TLS
>> land.
>>
>
> Correct. It is 8844. https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1387
>
> -Ekr
>
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to