> > > KT> Suggest: > > > > Work on post-quantum cryptography for TLS 1.2 MUST NOT be undertaken (see > Section 4) in the IETF and anyone wishing to deploy post-quantum > cryptography is expected to use TLS 1.3 (or newer). > > > > I don’t like this rephrasing. MUST NOT is stronger to me, than saying we > WILL NOT do something. > > >
KT2> This is what I find ambiguous :-) ... how about the following: Work on post-quantum cryptography for TLS 1.2 SHOULD NOT be undertaken (see Section 4) in the IETF and anyone wishing to deploy post-quantum cryptography is expected to use TLS 1.3 (or newer). Related work MAY be taken up by the TLS WG consensus in exceptional scenarios. Or, something along those lines. BCP14 keywords are recognized industry-wide (not just within IETF). IMHO it would be helpful if the message is clear using those keywords. I'll leave this to my SEC AD colleagues :-) Thanks, Ketan
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
