Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

2020-09-02 Thread Christopher Patton
I support adoption. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:17 PM Richard Barnes wrote: > I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG. > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi >> wrote: >> >>> I support adoption and am willing to

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

2020-09-02 Thread Richard Barnes
I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi > wrote: > >> I support adoption and am willing to help review. >> >> In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: >>

[TLS] Reminder TLS interim focused on ECH on Thursday

2020-09-02 Thread Joseph Salowey
Let the chairs know if you can help out as note taker or jabber scribe: The Transport Layer Security (tls) WG will hold a virtual interim meeting on 2020-09-03 from 10:00 to 11:00 America/Los_Angeles (17:00 to 18:00 UTC). Agenda: ECH Issue Discussion https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/i

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

2020-09-02 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi wrote: > I support adoption and am willing to help review. > > In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: > > https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00 > Thanks. I a

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

2020-09-02 Thread David Schinazi
I support adoption and am willing to help review. In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00 David On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM Ben Smyth wrote: > I support adoption

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

2020-09-02 Thread Ben Smyth
I support adoption and I am willing to help work on this. (Eric has already incorporated many of my suggestions, many thanks for that.) ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

2020-09-02 Thread Tim Wicinski
I support adoption on this. Yes, I'll assist in reviews, etc. tim On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:18 PM Christopher Wood wrote: > This email begins the adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis. As > mentioned [1], this updates language and fixes some errata against RFC8446 > (as identified

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

2020-09-02 Thread Eric Rescorla
Unsurprisingly, I support adoption. My hope here is that we can quickly flush out remaining issues that could cause confusion and get this to the IESG. -Ekr On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 9:20 AM Salz, Rich wrote: > I support this and will help work on it. > > _

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

2020-09-02 Thread Salz, Rich
I support this and will help work on it. ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

[TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis

2020-09-02 Thread Christopher Wood
This email begins the adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis. As mentioned [1], this updates language and fixes some errata against RFC8446 (as identified below). No other semantic changes were made. Errata fixed: - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6141, via https://github.com/ekr