Good morning,
Yesterday I got a new ISP. I have a new email address and I changed my
email address in the Fedora Account System. I just checked it this
morning and the new address is still there. However this morning the
meeting announcements and test reports came to my old email address.
For
On 3/22/23 03:57, Kamil Paral wrote:
Here's a second draft. I took feedback here and also from the QA meeting
[1]. The split between the milestones makes this harder to read and
compare. If you have better ideas on how to do it, please tell me :-)
The only suggestion I have is for the foot n
This morning when I saw the call for test days e'mail I had an idea that
I want to get some feedback on before I propose it as a test day.
I manage multiple systems and for each new release of Fedora
Workstation, I do installs (clean storage) rather that updates. This
gets rid of the trash in
On 10/17/22 8:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 10:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
If we don't think it's worth doing that work, then we're kinda stuck
with openQA glomming onto the critpath definition to decide which
updates to test and gate, because I don't have any othe
This is something I first saw at first branch and I have continued
monitoring it since. There has been no change.
The problem is that MP4, and AVI videos will not play on Totem. This is
probably not a blocker based on the current criteria. I doubt that a bug
report is even a proper thing to
Good morning everyone,
I know Gnome Shell Extension issues are not considered bugs. This is
just information.
Earlier when the discussion was going on about not being able to install
extensions I sent an e'mail to this list that mentioned this and said I
would check it out more when Gnome ha
On 9/12/22 3:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We have a handful of extensions packaged, though I'm not sure how well
they're kept up to date. Aside from those, I don't know of any other
really practical way for regular users to install extensions besides
https://extensions.gnome.org . Is there on
On 8/29/22 6:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks!
I have one of those definitional quandaries and I figured I'd throw it
at the lists for some input.
I spent some years as a project manager and I have lots of experience
with schedules. The term Crital Path was formalized in the business
Good day everyone,
Testing FWS F37 branched 20220816.n.0.
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and passed then loaded to a thumb drive using Media
Writer. The test machine booted to Live normally when the (start F37
live) was selected in G
On 4/26/22 09:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
Hi folks,
I saw RHBZ 2071228 [1] proposed as a freeze exception, but it looks
blockery to me. The report specifically mentions the fa_IR locale. It
would be very helpful for the purposes of blocker decision to know if
the problem is specific to that locale o
On 1/20/22 19:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks! So I've had this action item at meetings forever now:
"adamw to try and clarify intent of "default application functionality"
criterion regarding arches"
For all release-blocking desktop / arch combinations, the following
applications mu
Testing for Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220114.n.0 has started out a bit rough.
I booted the install media and the check passed, but while it was
booting the live I got the "Oh no!" sad face. I just waited for a while
then clicked the "Log Out" and after a bit the Anaconda started as a
very small win
On 11/26/21 19:04, Adam Williamson wrote:
3. "Ahmedalmeleh - Bugzilla is challenging to me and still getting used
to it. I wish I was able to learn how to operate OpenQA's automated
tests, in the given timeframe and was given guidance sooner.", also
Ahmed's 'wishlist' item and Matt's item - I'
In regard to the blocker I proposed on Cockpit Machines:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007775
Martin Pit has added a note to the bug: "This was
fixed upstream a few days ago. It will be part of Wednesday's c-machines
253 release."
https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit-
On 9/24/21 20:30, Adam Williamson wrote:
# F35 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2021-09-27
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
In regard to the blocker I proposed on Cockpit Machines:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007775
Martin Pit has add
On 9/17/21 07:29, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
What if we replaced the "10 seconds" with something like "reasonably fast".
With different machines people could have different expectations, so
somebody could consider 10 seconds a long time, while others could take 20
for normal.
This could make more roo
On 9/9/21 20:14, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2021-09-09 at 15:19 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
In regard to: Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-35-20210908.n.0
Today I thought I would see if the old issue with wireless networking
not being available in Fedora Linux Server is making progress
In regard to: Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-35-20210908.n.0
Today I thought I would see if the old issue with wireless networking
not being available in Fedora Linux Server is making progress toward
being resolved.
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was che
With F34 Workstation, I've been using a VM I set up with Cockpit to run
F34 Server. Here are then packages I install and settings I did to do this.
sudo dnf install cockpit
sudo dnf install cockpit-machines
sudo dnf install virt-viewer
sudo systemctl enable --now cockpit.socket
sudo firewall-c
My guess is that we start counting when the wall paper is up and the top
bar is displayed.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
On 8/25/21 06:43, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:00 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 11:13 -0400, Ben Cotton wrot
I've just read through: #131 Red Hat Bugzilla: GNOME packages are in
bad shape.
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/131
I always like to know the background of people who are talking to me so
here's a little, appropriate to this topic, background on me.
I'm one of those who help ou
On 3/17/21 21:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 15:59 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
I know I'm the one who always runs the old PCs, but I recently decided I
should have one new one in the mix. The one I got has an ASUS Z590-A
motherboard and an Intel i5-10400 proc
On 3/28/21 11:30, David wrote:
I just installed Shotwell on a Rawhide WS install.
I assume the first mirror it tried to contact ( twice ? ), and then went to
look in a different mirror ??
Here is a partial readout:
Downloading Packages:
[MIRROR] shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm: Status code
On 3/17/21 21:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 15:59 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
I know I'm the one who always runs the old PCs, but I recently decided I
should have one new one in the mix. The one I got has an ASUS Z590-A
motherboard and an Intel i5-10400 proc
I know I'm the one who always runs the old PCs, but I recently decided I
should have one new one in the mix. The one I got has an ASUS Z590-A
motherboard and an Intel i5-10400 processor. Well Fedora won't run a
Wayland session on it. It will only run a Gnome-xorg session. I even
had to run t
On 3/15/21 11:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:13:45AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
In the wake of the BZ 1924808[1] discussion in Thursday's Go/No-Go
meeting[2], I am proposing an addition to the Basic Release
Criteria[3]. This would go into Post-Install Requirements -> Expected
On 3/15/21 10:45, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:41 AM Brandon Nielsen wrote:
Can we also add a "and displayed without error" clause, or maybe
"completes with no visible error"? Something to explicitly capture the
"sad face" bug[0].
[0] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
In regard to testing F34 WS Beta candidate 1.2:
I was glad to see the white screen sad face gone. Everything went fine
through testing the SA basics. I did see the continuing SELinux bugs,
but I figure those are being worked on.
I set up a second user and logged the account in using Gnome-xor
I've been trying to load F33 in a machine with an i5-10400 processor
(UHD graphics). The video only works in Gonme xorg mode. I have to run
the install from Basic Graphics mode. Is that a known problem?
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
___
On 2/28/21 16:24, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 9:37 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I noticed that the QA Basic test case for reboot unmount has apparently
been removed. Is this no longer necessary with btrfs?
When I go to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
I noticed that the QA Basic test case for reboot unmount has apparently
been removed. Is this no longer necessary with btrfs?
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
On 2/26/21 14:53, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
On 2/25/21 15:24, Chris Murphy wrote:
An alternative is 'btrfs scrub start -BdR' which will not background
the scrub, and will give a detailed report upon completion.
Well I think tried all the combinations of scrub status with a
On 2/25/21 15:24, Chris Murphy wrote:
An alternative is 'btrfs scrub start -BdR' which will not background
the scrub, and will give a detailed report upon completion.
Well I think tried all the combinations of scrub status with and without
-B, -BdR, -dR to try and get status to report whi
On 2/24/21 20:48, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 2:26 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I recall a long and detailed discussion on this list before F33 was
released concerning what disk maintenance would be required with BTRFS.
As I recall, the final word was along the lines the
On 2/23/21 10:58, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:18:13AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
sudo btrfs scrub start /mnt
It's kind of unfortunate that we also have a command (in the distro since
2007) called just "scrub" which will destroy al of your data. :-/
Not going to lie, it to
On 2/21/21 16:18, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 6:18 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I'm sitting here thinking about F34 Beta being just two days away and
what I have observed in my testing. I must admit being more than a
little concerned.
Beta freeze starts Tue 2021-
I wholeheartedly agree with the proposal this needs to be approved. I
just added my encouragements to the discussion. We must not let the
approval for this get stalled. The words can be tweaked later if it
turns out to be necessary.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
On 2
I'm sitting here thinking about F34 Beta being just two days away and
what I have observed in my testing. I must admit being more than a
little concerned.
I have watched the blocker bugs and my concern stems from the fact that
I don't see some troubling ones listed there. Also there doesn't
In regard to my continued testing of F34 Workstation Beta. I am
currently at drop 0220.n.0
These are bare metal installs on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started norma
In regard to testing F34 WS Beta 0214.n.0:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. I haven't seen any No Boots for a
couple of drops now.
Anaconda star
I'm still seeing this on every restart or shutdown. Currently 0212.n.0
WS Beta. Bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU,
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
On 2/13/21 20:35, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 12:29 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
On Sat
All connectors both for power and signal have a finite life for mating
and de-mating. This is because the actual mating surfaces abrade each
other as they slide against each other. Also, any spring features in the
connector that keep the mating contacts together loose their tension
over repea
On 2/9/21 18:11, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:29 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
As I understand f3 it just writes files to the flash and reads them back
checking for errors. I'll go ahead and try f3 on the same thumb drive.
It can distinguish between different kin
On 2/9/21 13:19, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:23 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I've seen several ISOs lately that after they were written to a thumb
drive using media writer they wouldn't boot. I won't be recounting the
details I sent in prior motes to @
I've seen several ISOs lately that after they were written to a thumb
drive using media writer they wouldn't boot. I won't be recounting the
details I sent in prior motes to @test, but here is a little more
information.
The last one I tried was Workstation Live 0207.n.0. It failed to boot
For rawhide (F34) WS 0206.n.0 I am back to: It will not boot the Live
install thumb drive with no indication of why on my test machine (Lenovo
M83 i5-4570). The download, check sum, and mediawriter transfer to the
thumb drive showed no issues.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tabl
On 2/4/21 16:07, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 6:16 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I have noticed that during a restart, the thermal daemon apparently
doesn't respond to the stop and the system has to kill it after the 2
minute timeout. This makes restarts very slow. Is t
On 2/2/21 21:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 13:30 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
I forgot to mention in my last reply that my test PC is set up so it
tries to boot BIOS mode first then tries UEFI. Secure Boot is disabled
in the firmware setup of my test machine.
Hum
report the results.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
On 2/2/21 21:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 13:30 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
I forgot to mention in my last reply that my test PC is set up so it
tries to boot BIOS mode first then tries UEFI
On 2/2/21 10:42, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:39 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 17:00 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
As discussed in today's QA meeting I tried loading and installing
Rawhide (F34) Workstation drop 0128.
This was done on my
On 2/1/21 21:32, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 15:39 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 17:00 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
As discussed in today's QA meeting I tried loading and installing
Rawhide (F34) Workstation drop 0128.
This was done on my
As discussed in today's QA meeting I tried loading and installing
Rawhide (F34) Workstation drop 0128.
This was done on my test machine: This was an attempted bare metal
install on a Lenovo M83 desktop with an i5-4570 CPU. The ISO was check
summed and passed Then the ISO was loaded to a thum
Some points for today's QA meeting:
Does Gnome have anything like the Fedora new version Change Proposals?
If so do we have access to them?
I know there are some Fedora folks that also work on Gnome. I have no
doubt that they look out for potential issues, but that's not very
transparent.
On 1/14/21 03:22, Harold Dost wrote:
Essentially 4.0 === 40 and 40 is the new major version.
https://9to5linux.com/the-next-major-gnome-release-will-be-gnome-40-coming-march-2021
On Thu 14 Jan 2021 at 00:25, Adam Williamson
wrote:
On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 13:24 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com
On 1/14/21 03:49, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/14/21 12:30 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 14/01/2021 16:22, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/13/21 11:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 14/01/2021 13:54, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Application icons stopped being generally supported in Gnome a few
releases ago. Have you tried
On 1/13/21 12:15, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:51:50AM -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
While testing Rawhide F34 I have observed that the gnome-tweaks
application is missing the Extensions, Top Bar, and Workspaces
setting windows. Is this a bug of omission or are these
While testing Rawhide F34 I have observed that the gnome-tweaks
application is missing the Extensions, Top Bar, and Workspaces setting
windows. Is this a bug of omission or are these settings being removed
or added to GCC? I don't see them in GCC.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (
I filed a bug on an an application (kiten) on F33 Workstation back in
October. The application worked fine in F32 WS and it is now working
fine in Rawhide F34 WS, but the bug is still present in F33 WS on a
fully updated system. I checked and F34 WS is using a newer version of
kiten I checked B
The firewall applet bug I originally posted about a year ago hasn't
received much attention except for the Fedora version being updated. At
this point the bug report is a bit messy.
Today I decided to look around a bit and see if I could find some more
information. The basic problem is that it
The firewall-applet bug I originally posted about a year ago hasn't
received much attention except for the Fedora version being updated. At
this point the bug report is a bit messy.
Today I decided to look around a bit and see if I could find some more
information. The basic problem is that
On 1/4/21 03:06, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 2:58 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
While running tests on Fedora 34 Rawhide 20210102.n.0
When running test case QA:Testcase base update cli, it used to be that
there was a single file (something not essential as I recall) that
First!... Happy New Year Everyone. I hope you all had Great holidays.
While running tests on Fedora 34 Rawhide 20210102.n.0, I saw a problem
that has been present for about a year now. If it's considered a but, I
am at a loss to understand what category to put it in.
When running test case QA
First!... Happy New Year Everyone. I hope you all had Great holidays.
While running tests on Fedora 34 Rawhide 20210102.n.0 today, I saw a
problem that has been present for about a year now. If it's considered a
but, I am at a loss to understand what category to put it in.
When running test c
On 10/28/20 11:44, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 11:21:07 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
Are you saying that the warning message about the 19 lines is a don't care
or is their a problem with the way the checksum file is made? Does this mean
that the OK message that comes
On 10/28/20 11:07, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 10:55:28 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
On 10/28/20 10:16, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I think sha256sum is pointing out the 19 lines related to the PGP
Signature in the CHECKSUM file, which it can't understand.
https://getfedor
On 10/28/20 10:16, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 09:32:51 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
I wanted a fresh copy of the F33 ISO to use for the PCs I maintain. I went
to the getfedora.org site. and downloaded the ISO and CHECKSUM files for F33
Workstation.
When I run:
sha256sum
I wanted a fresh copy of the F33 ISO to use for the PCs I maintain. I
went to the getfedora.org site. and downloaded the ISO and CHECKSUM
files for F33 Workstation.
When I run:
sha256sum -c Fedora-Workstation-live-33-1;2-x86_64-CHECKSUM
I get:
Fedora-Workstation-live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso: OK
B
I've been testing right along, but haven't been reporting since the
problems I have encountered have been small compared to some of the
issues currently on the table. I am currently running F33
Workstation-Live 0916.n.0. As usual my testing is on bare metal. The
installs have been running fin
alciregi,
I have a similar issue. Reference the bug below.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812515
Try the following. Set up a root password. On the terminal use (sudo
passwd). Enter a pass word and then verify it. Close the terminal. Open
your browser and go to localhost:631 then
In regard to my testing of F33 Workstation Rawhide drop 20200811.n.0:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started normally. For the
disk, C
I'm about done with the 0804 drop. Mostly I've been concentrating on my
as deployed testing to see if btrfs would show a problem. So far though
I'll say: Everything is Essentially, Virtually, Effectively, good. :)
There are just a couple of old bugs that are still hanging around.
https://bug
On 7/22/20 12:41, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Most compression algorithms are far more than "removing same value byte
strings". Check out "huffman encoding" for example. I've never had a
lossless compression program corrupt my data. Given your extreme
mistrust of compression algorithms, it seems
On 7/21/20 18:06, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 3:36 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
The only ones I've ever seen (not a large population since
I've been a compression avoid-er) that approach lossless don't compress
much and only take out strings of the same
On 7/21/20 13:11, Chris Murphy wrote:
Yeah, lossy algorithms are common in imaging. There are many kinds
that unquestionably do not produce identical encoding to the original
once decompressed. The algorithms being used by Btrfs are all lossless
compression, and in fact those are also commonly
On 7/20/20 21:34, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
That's a misleading log message; see e.g. this discussion
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=231884
You probably want to use this to check the actual RAID level.
btrfs filesystem df /
source:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Use
On 7/20/20 13:31, Samuel Sieb wrote:
First a bit of background all the PCs (Fedora WS) I maintain are
bought with lots of ram 8GB is the min. I don't think I've ever seen
swap move off zero and no one has reported any sort of slowdowns. Yet
we do lots of memory intensive things. Of course all
As promised in the QA meeting today I have installed an old drop of WS
to find the place in Anaconda I thought was there to turn off or not
select compression for a disk drive. As it turns out I must have been
having a pleasant dream or mistakenly remembered the one for encryption
and There was
Let's talk about zram.
I just got around to figuring out what zram is. I see it's automatically
set up when Anaconda sets up btrfs.
First a bit of background all the PCs (Fedora WS) I maintain are bought
with lots of ram 8GB is the min. I don't think I've ever seen swap move
off zero and no
Over the past few days I have learned a little about btrfs. I have
provided the links to the posts below: Magazine proposal: (1),
Discussion: (2), Ticket 2429: (3)
I've done some testing on 0703 with btrfs and I am just getting started
with 0713 with btrfs. I think the only way to really get
Over the past few days I have learned a little about btrfs. I have
provided the links to the posts below: Magazine proposal: (1),
Discussion: (2), Ticket 2429: (3)
I've done some testing on 0703 with btrfs and I am just getting started
with 0713 with btrfs. I think the only way to really get
On 7/9/20 10:31, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 5:46 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
However as I look at the journal it's not
clear if this is a problem or if we need to update the testcase for
btrfs. I've attached the journal file for your reading pleasure.
This
On 7/6/20 19:53, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:43 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I was not
successful in getting the disk configuration set in a configuration that
Anaconda would accept for installation.
Yeah, custom installation is a little bit of a mind-screw. :(
You are
After the QA meeting today, I spent a few hours trying the get Rawhide
0703 WS Live installed with btrfs.
I have Rawhide 0703 WS Live on a thumb drive. I know this works fine
when taking the default for the disk. I was trying to do a bare metal
install to my test machine (Lenovo M53 with a
This is in regard to my testing of Rawhide F33 Workstation drop 00620.n.1:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started normally. Options
to
On 5/13/20 12:34, Adam Williamson wrote:
I ended up putting
(sudo su) at the top of each script and just ran the commands without
the (su -c). That seemed to work fine.
Is there a critical to the test reason to use (su -c)?
No. It really just means "do this as root". There are various ways y
In regard to: QA:Testcase base service manipulation
Back about a year ago now I started fiddling around with this test case
to see if I could make it a bit easier to run.
A little background first. After I have my test machine set up and ready
to start testing a new drop I always do the login
In regard to my testing of: Fedora-WS-Live-rawh-20200510-n-0
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started normally. Options
to delete all and
On 4/22/20 16:54, tmsta...@t-mittelstaedt.de wrote:
Am 22.04.2020 11:54 schrieb Silvia Sánchez :
But from *where* do I download the ISO ?
On the wiki page are the download links.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/32/Fedora-32-20200421.0/compose/Workstation/x86_64/iso/
On 4/21/20 13:25, Adam Williamson wrote:
stardict-dic-en
stardict-dic-ja
These were both retired as they were unmaintained. You can always check
this in dist-git:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stardict-dic-ja
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stardict-dic-en
general
In regard to my testing of F32 Workstation-Live x86-64 RC1.4:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started normally. Options
to delete all a
I've seen that SELinux is still not allowing the accounts-daemon access
to sys-nice. I see there is a bug filed on this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811407
There seem to be two lines of thought about a solution. One to change
SELinux granting daemons access and the other see
On 4/16/20 16:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 13:57 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
It's not about interpretation or not, it's just about a preference for
this:
Test Steps
--
1. Step 1
2. Step 2
3. Step 3
Expected Results
1. Expecte
It's not about interpretation or not, it's just about a preference for
this:
Test Steps
--
1. Step 1
2. Step 2
3. Step 3
Expected Results
1. Expected result 1
2. Expected result 2
3. Expected result 3
versus this:
Test Steps and Expected Results
--
On 4/16/20 11:21, Adam Williamson wrote:
If we're gonna write test cases like that, we should probably just have
an alternative template, or an alternative "mode" for the template we
have. I don't like using a template which clearly expects the "Here are
the steps, and here are the expected
The approach the current criteria were intended to back was one where
we would have something like rawhide-backgrounds or development-
backgrounds which contained a background image that was very obviously
a WORK IN PROGRESS kind of thing - picture of Beefy with "PRE RELEASE"
written on it, or
In regard to my testing of Workstation-Live RC1.3:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started normally. Options
to delete all and reclaim
On 4/4/20 15:27, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 10:45 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I'm not sure the having UEFI is the differentiator... I have a 6th gen I5
computer which boots UEFI fine but predates NVMe. On that one I use a
PCIEx4 adapter and have /boot and /boot/E
I just finished my testing of 0401 on my bare metal test system. The
results were not reported because the current event is 0404.
Everything looks good except for the bugs I already reported and they
are not blockers.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812510
https://bugzilla.redha
On 4/4/20 10:24, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 9:14 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
One thing that seems rather puzzling is that NVMe is offered in three
different connection configurations. PCI-E, USB (with a USB connector),
and SSD via SATA (with an SATA connector. Since
At last Monday's meeting there was mention of a need to start testing
with NVMe. I volunteered to get some and help with that. Part of my
motivation was the desire to become familiar with it and see if it's
something I might have an application for. NVMe seems to have been
created created mo
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
