Test Days: Anaconda installer with DNF 5

ntegration with DNF 5, and removal of the modularity support. Test period: 2025-07-28 to 2025-08-01 Test instructions: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2025-07-28_Anaconda_installer_DNF_5_test_day Thank you for your contributions! Kamil Paral Fedora QA [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA

Proposal: No longer block releases on ARM desktop

regularly. When replying, **please**, reply to the Discussion topic. Logging in through FAS is trivial. We want a unified discussion in one place, instead of having it split between multiple places. Thank you. Kamil Paral Fedora Quality -- ___ test

Proposal: Re-consider Edition status for IoT

regularly. When replying, **please**, reply to the Discussion topic. Logging in through FAS is trivial. We want a unified discussion in one place, instead of having it split between multiple places. Thank you. Kamil Paral Fedora Quality -- ___ test mailing

Proposal: Limit release-blocking status of BIOS systems to just certain scenarios

not watching Fedora Discussion regularly. When replying, **please**, reply to the Discussion topic. Logging in through FAS is trivial. We want a unified discussion in one place, instead of having it split between multiple places. Thank you. Kamil Paral Fedora Quality

Proposal: Limit release-blocking ARM hardware and unify with IoT definition

watching Fedora Discussion regularly. When replying, **please**, reply to the Discussion topic. Logging in through FAS is trivial. We want a unified discussion in one place, instead of having it split between multiple places. Thank you. Kamil Paral Fedora Quality

Proposal: Require just the standard set of apps to be release-blocking on Workstation x86_64, not all apps

post feedback, even when not watching Fedora Discussion regularly. When replying, **please**, reply to the Discussion topic. Logging in through FAS is trivial. We want a unified discussion in one place, instead of having it split between multiple places. Thank you. Kamil Paral Fedora Quality

Proposal: Drop Intel-based Macbook dual boot release criterion

Fedora Discussion regularly. When replying, **please**, reply to the Discussion topic. Logging in through FAS is trivial. We want a unified discussion in one place, instead of having it split between multiple places. Thank you. Kamil Paral Fedora Quality

Proposal: Drop optical media boot release criterion

Discussion regularly. When replying, **please**, reply to the Discussion topic. Logging in through FAS is trivial. We want a unified discussion in one place, instead of having it split between multiple places. Thank you. Kamil Paral Fedora Quality -- ___ test

Fedora Quality scope reduction announcement and summary

We want a unified discussion in one place, instead of having it split between multiple mailing lists (that's why we picked Discussion). Thank you. Kamil Paral Fedora Quality -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an e

Re: Self-introduction: Vít Smolík (smoliicek)

On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 10:23 PM Vít Smolík via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hello everyone! > > My name is Vítek, I'm an IT student and administrator from Czechia. I'm > just getting started in the Fedora project and I'm interested in helping > the QA/testing team. > > I have bee

Re: Self Introduction

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 11:24 PM Mark East via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Dear Fedora QA Team, > > > my name is Mark, username @cirrus, I’ve been a GNU/Linux user for a decade > or more, > > and I'm excited to contribute to the Fedora Project, in particular the QA > testing. >

Re: [F43] Kernel 6.15 Test Week

On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 9:26 PM Christopher Klooz wrote: > On 11/06/2025 16.42, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Thanks, Christopher. I created an RFE here: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/testdays-web/issue/55 > > > > > Oh, I didn't know about that repo, makes sense, th

Re: [F43] Kernel 6.15 Test Week

On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 10:47 AM Christopher Klooz wrote: > A just posted my results to the testing day. I mentioned a bug ticket of > AMDGPU (freedesktop.org), which seems not yet an allowed TLD for Bug > URLs: I had to put it in the comment. I suggest to add freedesktop.org to > the allowed TLD

Re: proposal: move "Image size requirements" release criterion from Beta to Final

On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 9:34 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > Thanks everyone for your feedback. I'll wait a few more days and then > implement it. > Implemented now: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_43_Beta_Release_Criteria&diff=740088&oldid=740085 https

Re: proposal: move "Image size requirements" release criterion from Beta to Final

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 5:52 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Another +1, this makes perfect sense. > Thanks everyone for your feedback. I'll wait a few more days and then implement it. > While we're on the topic, we should also consider bumping the netinst > limit generally to 1.2G. Several netins

proposal: move "Image size requirements" release criterion from Beta to Final

Hi, in the F42 cycle, we had a bug blocking Beta because one image was oversize [1], and realized [2] that it might be time to revisit this criterion [3]. The criterion targets Beta historically, because with optical media, there was no way of using a "larger install medium". That's no longer the c

Re: Postfix upgrade problems F41->F42

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:58 PM James Szinger wrote: > I'd like to nominate Bug 2360491 - Postfix missing alternative > /usr/sbin/sendmail -> /usr/bin/sendmail.postfix > > as a common bug for Fedora 42 and a blocker for Fedora 43. > You can

Re: [Test-Announce]Fedora 42 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 4:48 PM rawhide via test-announce < test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 42 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > testing! For more information on release validation

Re: F42: firmware from testing bad on AMD Kaveri Radeon R7

On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 1:03 AM Felix Miata wrote: > I upgraded to current after last upgrade 18 Feb., and included > linux-firmware* > and amd-gpu-firmware-20250211-1 from testing. This limited both > framebuffers and > Xorg to 1024x768 running either 6.13.5 or 6.12.13, but 6.11.11 remained OK. >

Re: Draft anaconda webui test cases and matrix changes

On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 2:05 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! So as we're once again trying the 'anaconda webui is release > blocking' thing for F42, and it actually hasn't been reverted yet for > once, I've drafted up new test cases and matrix changes. Here's my > draft matrix page: > > ht

Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 5:56 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > But we *don't* only care about that. We *do* want to make sure that > upgrade doesn't suddenly turn your KDE install into Workstation, for > instance. > OK. What if we made it more explicit, since this is clearly one of the major goals of

Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 8:41 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! I decided it's finally time to knock this action item off my > todo list... > > Last cycle, we had a proposed blocker[1] which relied on a footnote to > the Beta upgrade criterion which was added way back when we first set > up the

Re: Update has been bouncing of Bohdi for months

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 2:24 AM Ian Laurie via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Someone who understands the mechanisms needs to take a look at: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-4e960d96d5 > > It's been submitted to stable about 3 million times but keeps bouncing

Re: Results for F39 to F41 upgrades tests

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 7:36 PM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Hello, > as promised, I am sending the results of the upgrade tests from F39 to F41. > > *Test 1: Upgrade from F39 to F41 using Software* > When Software is used to perform the upgrade, the mentioned applications, > Camera and Ptyxis, *do not

Re: Problem rpm in f42

On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 8:51 PM Robert McBroom wrote: > The following packages have not been able to update for the last two > weeks. There is no indication what is preventing the updates > > Skipping packages with conflicts: > libavcodec-free x86_64 > 7.0.2-6.fc42

Re: Self-introduction: Niels-s

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 12:57 PM Niels via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm joining the Fedora QA. > Been using Linux for just around a year, but convinced in the meantime > that Fedora's worth the effort to contribute to the community. > > No programming skills,

Re: System doesn't fully wake from sleep when VM are in use

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 2:01 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:24 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > >> Oh, fun. I can reproduce this when I'm using user-session virtual >> machines (gnome-boxes or virt-manager). It doesn't happen when >> system-session

Re: System doesn't fully wake from sleep when VM are in use

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:24 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > Oh, fun. I can reproduce this when I'm using user-session virtual machines > (gnome-boxes or virt-manager). It doesn't happen when system-sessions VMs > are used. > That's a bummer. I'll create a bug report

Re: System doesn't fully wake from sleep when VM are in use

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 12:52 PM Alessio wrote: > Indeed, issuing "sudo systemctl thaw user.slice" via ssh, the GDM login > screen reappears. > Oh, fun. I can reproduce this when I'm using user-session virtual machines (gnome-boxes or virt-manager). It doesn't happen when system-sessions VMs are

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 3:09 AM Brandon Nielsen via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Not directly related to KDE / ARM, but did I somehow miss the announce > emails? Now that I think about it, I haven't seen one for a candidate > compose in a couple of weeks either. > All the test/ca

Help needed: Intel-based Mac dual boot testing

Hi folks, if anyone has an Intel-based Mac (Macbook, Mac Mini) which could be used for dual-boot testing with Fedora 41, that would be very helpful. We don't have any such hardware at hand at the moment. The testing instructions are here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_dualboot_with_ma

Re: Proposing Beta UT package set enable Release Criteria

On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 3:21 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > *modular* should be gone completely now, so drop mention of it? >> > > In that case Kevin, I will also have to update a few more places. Given > Adamw and Kamil agree :) > I think it's fine to drop modular mentions in all places (there m

Re: Proposing Beta UT package set enable Release Criteria

On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 7:36 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Proposed Beta Criteria: > > Release identification > A fedora-release package containing the correct names and information and > a fedora-repos package containing the correct repository configuration for > a Beta Fedora release must be pr

Re: ABRT - Server says: 400 Bad Request

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 8:14 AM lejeczek via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi guys. > > I've submitted a bug and it's been a while with no comments, so I hope - > perhaps devel checks herel - here I'll get more luck/feedback. > Please give us a link to the reported bugzilla. Also,

Re: Self-introduction thephatle

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 5:37 AM Marko Jokinen via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > hello > > i am thephatle real name Marko Jokinen Retired Head Chef currently > co-founder and CTO on International Tourism company. Originally From > scandinavia living in Asia but soon Moving back to S

Re: 2024-07-22 - Fedora Quality Meeting - minutes

On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:00 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > Action items > > * kparal to update Desktop test matrix template to mark KDE as > blocking on aarch64 It was not just the Desktop matrix. Here are the changes I made: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?ti

2024-07-22 - Fedora Quality Meeting - minutes

Text Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-07-22/quality.2024-07-22-15.00.log.txt HTML Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-07-22/quality.2024-07-22-15.00.log.html Text Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeti

Re: [Proposal] TestDays Category TestCase Tags

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 7:24 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hello Testers, > Hi Sumantro. Just a note, I'd send proposals to the test list only. (And even after it is decided, I don't think wiki categories are something that most subscribers are that interested in ;-)). > Fedora QA has been ho

Re: changes to nouveau driver in kernel 6.8.2 and higher?

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 5:59 PM AV via test wrote: > I have been trying out fedora 40 beta on a Dell XPS 15 9500 with > integrated Intel UHD graphics and discrete Nvidia graphics. > Everything worked perfectly with the 6.8.1 kernel and using nouveau > but things started to happen after the upgrad

Re: Bash terminal: intermittently, significant lag up to 20 seconds for characters to be rendered on the screen

On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 12:06 AM John Lynch wrote: > Since upgrading from 39 to 40, when I issue a command in the Terminal, > sometimes I have to wait for the character to be displayed. If I press > another key, then the previous character shows up, but it continues thus. > I am running an Asus

Re: System JDK update from JDK 17 to JDK 21 ready to be pushed to stable

On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:39 PM Petra Mikova wrote: > Can you please tell us how to proceed to get this change pushed to > stable? There was a deadline set for our changes to be pushed today > (Wednesday), so please let us know if we have to do some additional > steps to ensure the update makes it

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 40 Branched 20240216.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:30 PM wrote: > > Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event > for Fedora 40 Branched 20240216.n.0. HEADS UP cockpit-311-1.fc40 landed yesterday, but anaconda-webui-6-1.fc40 landed only today, which means the F40 Workstation image (Fedora-Works

Re: Kernel 6.7 Test Week Invitation

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 2:29 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > As usual, the Fedora QA team will hangout at #fedora-test-...@libera.chat > for questions and discussion. > Will we? The wiki page says "Matrix: #test-day:fedoraproject.org". At the same time, it says "You can chat with us on IRC" [1].

Re: test Digest, Vol 238, Issue 1

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:00 AM Rick Marshall wrote: > Hi All > > Since the F39 update pppd is broken (perhaps not in all cases but the > config needs to be changed and it's not obvious). > Please file a bug in RH Bugzilla and post the link here, thanks. -- _

Re: [Test-Announce] 2023-12-11 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 7:26 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I suppose also you could make a new account and try with it to confirm > you get the agreement and things work with it? > Also make sure to disable any extensions like adblockers etc, which might interfere with it. -- _

Re: [Test-Announce] 2023-12-11 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 10:03 PM pmkellly wrote: > What is the recommended client? > > I can recommend the browser-based Element [1], it works well. And I think it's also the client recommended by default. [1] https://app.element.io -- ___ test mailing

Re: Heads up: removed installer help release criterion and archived test case

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 9:19 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! I just wanted to give a heads up - I've removed the > installer help criterion from the Final release criteria: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_40_Final_Release_Criteria&diff=695349&oldid=695347 > > why?

Re: [Test-Announce] 2023-11-27 @ ** 16:00 ** UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 3:11 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > Greetings testers! It's time for another QA meeting. > Sorry, can't attend today. > == Proposed Agenda Topics == > > 1. Previous meeting follow-up > 2. Fedora 40 check-in and Change review > 3. Communications overhaul: Discourse and Matr

Re: Self-Presentation Niccolo' to QA Team

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 7:25 PM Niccolò Zuccolo wrote: > Hello Fedora QA Team Members, > > My name is Niccolo' and it is my pleasure to introduce myself as a new > member interested in contributing to your Quality Assurance team. Fedora is > a community and project that I have long admired, and I

Re: F39-beta Live OS: Mouse stops working after changing Display Orientation in Settings.

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:31 AM Rob Lahaye wrote: > Hi, > > I start the Live OS of F39 > (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-39_Beta-1.1.iso) on a system that requires > a display orientation of "Portrait Right". > As soon as I change the display orientation, the mouse stops working. > It works fine

Re: Failed to start udisks2.service

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 6:55 PM camiro pan wrote: > Hello everybody, > > i run fedora 38 on my dell xps 9300 and want to install Fedora 39 > beta/nightly. > When i boot from a Fedora 39 (nightly) boot device i get the error > message: > "[Failed] Failed to start udisks2.service - Disk Manager". >

Re: [Fedora Rawhide][x86 MacBook] Can’t boot after dnf system-upgrade 39 to Rawhide

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 7:37 PM Osama Albahrani via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi! > > I wanted to test Fedora Rawhide so I ran `dnf system-upgrade download > --releasever rawhide --exclude=sdubby` (as per > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243872#c12) to upgrade fro

Re: anyone available to test x86_64 macOS dual boot?

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 1:23 PM Osama Albahrani via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi Kamil, > > I have an intel-based MacBook Pro (2017). I tried the iso the other day > and submitted the following bugzilla for it: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243144 > I see th

anyone available to test x86_64 macOS dual boot?

It would be great if somebody could test Fedora 39 dual boot on a macOS device, because our internal team currently doesn't have hardware to do so. It needs to be an older x86_64 Mac (Macbook, Mac Mini, etc), the newer M-based Macs are not yet supported by Fedora. Is here anyone who has access to

Fwd: [Test-Announce] Please help complete validation testing for current Fedora 39 candidate nightly!

-- Forwarded message - From: Adam Williamson Date: Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 1:50 AM Subject: [Test-Announce] Please help complete validation testing for current Fedora 39 candidate nightly! To: Hey folks! You probably saw the mail "Fedora 39 Branched 20231010.n.0 nightly compose nom

Re: The desktop of Fedora Robotics top left corner no display “Activity”， is a white cube

> When install Fedora Robotics in virtualbox 7.0.10， after start Fedora > Robotics， top left corner is a white cube， then install into disk，chinese > version， reboot again，top left corner is a white cube as before。 Yes, GNOME changed it. It no longer says Activities, it shows workspaces. The act

Re: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-39_Beta-1.1.iso wont boot in VMWare Player

Does it work for you if you boot it using libvirt (e.g. virt-manager / gnome-boxes / cockpit)? ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.f

Re: Text is blurry in apps like edge, spotify etc. But not blur in system apps , firefox.

You shouldn't run this with sudo, just as a regular user. What do you get if you run $ gsettings get org.gnome.mutter experimental-features ? Here's how it should work: $ gsettings get org.gnome.mutter experimental-features ['scale-monitor-framebuffer'] $ gsettings set org.gnome.mutter experimenta

Re: Text is blurry in apps like edge, spotify etc. But not blur in system apps , firefox.

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 1:30 PM Neil Chetty wrote: > I recelty upgraded from F38 to F39. In F38 i was using default settings > for display which is 2880x1800(16:10), 90hz,200% scaling. AFter upgrading > to F39 when scaling is set to 200 percent texts are blurry in apps except > system apps and fi

Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 5:22 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade. > > The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current > configuration*. So in the "typical" case, you are upgrading from a > stable Fedora release with default repo

Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:05 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > The added work for a FE seems pretty minimal to me (3 people write +1, I > push it to the accepted FE in about a minute), not sure if the releng > perspective is different here though? > I see it a bit differently. Even when just consid

freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

Lately we've seen a surge of FTI (fails to install) bugs being proposed as freeze exceptions [1] [2]. We generally grant them, because we want the base repo to be in a consistent and buildable state. However, I wonder, isn't this approach mostly relevant for the Final release? Does it make sense to

Re: Add toolbx to Basic release matrix and tag toolbx test case

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:37 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > [2] > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Base_test_matrix&oldid=687376 > [3] > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Base_test_matrix&oldid=687377 I tweaked the ordering a bit to make sure Basic test ca

Re: 2023-08-21 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 8:09 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting > # Date: 2023-08-21 > # Time: 15:00 UTC > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) > # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat > > Greetings testers! Once again it's been a bit of ti

Re: Join now GNOME 45 Test Week

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 5:39 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hello, > > As most of you might know, with each new release of Fedora, we get a > new GNOME and that means this is the time to test GNOME 45's new > features. GNOME 45 test week begins today. During the course of next > week, we will hav

Re: PROPOSAL to remove Modularity tests from openQA

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:20 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Hello, > > based on this ( > https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/c/38890fd54281a3dc2dd64439de8955637ca6f2a7?branch=main), > I am proposing to put the Modularity tests on hold for some time (modular > features are currently not supported in DNF5 a

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:21 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Thanks a lot Kamil and Adamw!! > Can I go and publish this under the Beta criteria? :) > @Kamil Paral it will be awesome, if you can point me > to the correct criteria template , please? > Thumbs up from me. Here&

Re: Rawhide update gating on openQA tests will be enabled Wednesday

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:27 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 18:28 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks! So, as per https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3011 , we plan to > > enable gating of Rawhide updates on openQA test results on Wednesday. > > This is now enabled! Please l

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:07 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > ~ > For any release-blocking deliverable whose default deployment includes > Toolbx, the {{command|toolbox}} CLI must be able to list existing > containers. One nitpick, it's not clear whether "list" means listing loc

Re: DNF5 testing ~ Unknown argument "--skip-broken"

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 12:10 AM Ian Laurie via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 6/15/23 00:15, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >> Is this option being added or is this a bug? > >> > > > > seems related with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501804 No, that bug is only related t

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 7:07 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > FESCo has approved[0] this changeset and now the criterion needs to be in > place. I will gather all the knowledge and the corrections that have been > talked about in this thread and start a fresh one for voting? > > [0] https://pagure.i

Re: DNF5 is in f38 updates-testing ?????

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:32 AM Ian Laurie wrote: > I was under the impression DNF5 was being held of until F39? > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b3c645d401 "dnf5" is a separate package from "dnf" (version 4 in F38). It's already in stable repos, and you can install it a

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 6:39 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Adam & Kamil, since my criteria starts with"for each release-blocking > artifact", do you folks think its a good idea to site the criterion? or at > least have it? I am not able to find it as well. > You mean "cite", right? :-) Cite whic

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:48 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > The revised criterion I have now stands as: > > > For any release-blocking deliverable whose default deployment includes > toolbx, the toolbox CLI must be able to list existing containers, > toolbx -> Toolbx to denote you're talking

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:48 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0]. > Great, I think this is the best approach. > The revised criterion I have now stands as: > Does it make sense to wait for the FESCo approval before we finalize the

Re: [Testdays] Call for Fedora Linux 39 testing events

On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:10 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends! > > It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 39. > Neal Gompa asked for a popular third-party apps test day recently: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedora

Re: Introducing Steam + video game testing criteria

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > Is there a way we can add regular testing for it without making it a > blocker then? > For popular third-party software, I think this testing occurs quite naturally - people just use it. E.g. Steam, Chrome, VSCode, etc. I've been running Steam

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

> > ~ > For any release-blocking deliverable whose default deployment includes > toolbox, it must be > possible to list existing containers, enter them, and create a new one. > > > Footnote - "What does this cover?": > Toolbox

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 5:57 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > There is a push from the > Dekstop team to have toolbox as a default app in the installer iso as > well. The 'toolbox' package is already installed by default. Or do you mean some related GUI app? > > Toolbox aka Toolbx

Re: rc.local fails

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 1:54 AM George R Goffe via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Howdy, > > To get rc.local running you used to be able to put the file in /etc/rc.d > and then reboot. > > This has worked for quite some time but does not any more. This situation > has been happening

Re: Copy as HTML in Gnome Terminal (f38beta)

On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 8:11 AM Robin A. Meade wrote: > I'm having trouble with the *Copy as HTML* menu item in GnomeTerminal in > Fedora 38 beta. > > When I paste the result into a Google doc, the result is HTML code. > > When I paste the result into a Libre Office Writer doc, the result is an >

Re: new criterion proposal: Window manager functionality

On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 6:05 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 15:21 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 5:34 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > > At today's QA meeting, nobody had any further objections. If there's no > >

Re: new criterion proposal: Window manager functionality

On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 5:34 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > At today's QA meeting, nobody had any further objections. If there's no > additional feedback, I'll push it live tomorrow. > This is now live: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Basic_Release_Criteria&typ

Re: new criterion proposal: Window manager functionality

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:57 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > Here's a second draft. I took feedback here and also from the QA meeting > [1]. The split between the milestones makes this harder to read and > compare. If you have better ideas on how to do it, please tell me :-) > > ~~~

Re: Feedback F38 Beta

On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:50 AM old sixpack13 wrote: > dnf remove kernel-core > > doesn't remove the directory for that kernel under /lib/modules/ > Please report a bug against kernel here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ The kernel maintainers are not watching this list. Thanks. __

Re: crypto-policies

On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 8:20 AM Neal H. Walfield wrote: > Panu wrote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170878#c126 : > > > To me the key points here are > > 1) there's a lot of obsolete/broken crypto out there > > 2) we need better error messages > > > > Properly dealing with 2) needs

Re: 2023-03-27 @ **16:00** UTC - Fedora 38 Blocker Review Meeting

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:23 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > # F37 Blocker Review meeting > # Date: 2023-03-27 > # Time: **16:00** UTC > # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat > I added this to Fedocal and it shows up at https://qa.fedoraproject.org/ now :-) __

Re: new criterion proposal: Window manager functionality

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 1:17 PM pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > > > On 3/22/23 03:57, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Here's a second draft. I took feedback here and also from the QA meeting > > [1]. The split between the milestones makes this harder to read and > > comp

Re: new criterion proposal: Window manager functionality

Here's a second draft. I took feedback here and also from the QA meeting [1]. The split between the milestones makes this harder to read and compare. If you have better ideas on how to do it, please tell me :-) == Basic milestone == For each release-blocking desktop, the desktop envir

Re: new criterion proposal: Window manager functionality

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:59 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:48 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common > application content - that includes regular application windows, video > output, games and

new criterion proposal: Window manager functionality

Related to a recently proposed blocker [1][2], I propose a new release criterion which would cover such cases. Here it is: The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common application content - that includes regular application windows, video output, games and possib

Re: F38 dnf modules isn't going to be functional

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 10:14 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 2:20 PM Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > >> But that's microdnf, not the current default dnf. I don't think microdnf >> was used by default in any of our blocking spins/images. >> > > We ship microdnf in the arm min

Re: Install java-latest-openjdk-headless failed in Fedora-Rawhide

On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 2:19 AM wang_chen wrote: > dnf install -y java-latest-openjdk.x86_64 java-latest-openjdk-devel.x86_64 > java-latest-openjdk-headless.x86_64 > > 错误：事务测试失败： > file /usr/lib/.build-id/4e/d857f31670d36b42e0e4e7cc60da99c9e598da from > install of java-latest-openjdk-headless-1:

Re: [Proposal] Dropping YYYY-MM-DD from Test Day Page Title

On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 2:28 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > So, I am thinking when the > test day/week are over. How about then we add the date and pass it through > the testdays CLI tool. > This would be a solution if we don't want to adjust our tooling. The wiki pages can be created like "TestD

Re: [Proposal] Dropping YYYY-MM-DD from Test Day Page Title

For the record, it was me who nudged Sumantro to send this proposal. It's my understanding that having the date in the title discourages Sumantro (or anyone handling it) from creating the wiki page too soon, before the page is really settled. It makes sense, because any date change (and sometimes t

Re: Please vote on blocker tickets!

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 5:20 PM Luna Jernberg wrote: > Hey! > > Did vote some today, was not the Blockers meetings supposed to start > today? or did i got that wrong and they are starting up later this > cycle? > Adam wasn't available today and nobody else decided to run it. It'll happen next we

Re: Fedora 38: GDM not recognizing Wayland, only X11

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:27 PM Scott Beamer wrote: > I filed a bug report today. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com//show_bug.cgi?id=2172291 But you haven't replied to my question, nor did you provide necessary details in the bug report. At least "journalctl -b" and "lspci -nn" output should be

Re: Fedora 38: GDM not recognizing Wayland, only X11

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 4:09 PM Scott Beamer wrote: > Greetings, > > I did a fresh install of Fedora 38 on 19 February from the latest Live > images (both Workstation and KDE Spin). > > Workstation install lists no option for either X11 or Wayland. Default > GNOME selection lands you in a GNOM

Re: criterion change proposal: macOS dual-boot

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:55 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > Our current macOS (still called OS X) dual boot criterion says: > > "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an > existing OS X installation, install and configure a bootloader that will > boo

Re: criterion change proposal: macOS dual-boot

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 7:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I am not sure 100% of intel macs are supported either however. > I have a macbook here with the touchbar thing and last I tried it, > fedora will boot, but the keyboard doesn't work at all. That was like a > year or so ago tho, so I should try a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >