[Test-Announce]2024-09-23 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 41 Blocker Review Meeting

2024-09-21 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
# F41 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2024-09-23 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: https://matrix.to/#/#blocker -review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! We have 2 proposed blockers for Final. Here is a handy l

Re: changes to nouveau driver in kernel 6.8.2 and higher?

2024-04-11 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
I've reported it and proposed as a Final Blocker at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274490 On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 5:59 PM AV via test wrote: > I have been trying out fedora 40 beta on a Dell XPS 15 9500 with > integrated Intel UHD graphics and discrete Nvidia graphics. > Everythin

Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

2023-09-05 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:31 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > Lately we've seen a surge of FTI (fails to install) bugs being proposed as > freeze exceptions [1] [2]. We generally grant them, because we want the > base repo to be in a consistent and buildable state. However, I wonder, > isn't this approach

Re: F38 dnf modules isn't going to be functional

2023-03-15 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
But that's microdnf, not the current default dnf. I don't think microdnf was used by default in any of our blocking spins/images. On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:44 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 2:09 PM Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > >>

Re: F38 dnf modules isn't going to be functional

2023-03-15 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
But the dnf > dnf5 switch will happen in F39, not F38, so that shouldn't be an issue that it's not supported in DNF 5, no? On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 8:32 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > DNF5 test day is running and we have figured that dnf modules command > is being worked on. > The functionality c

Re: Proposed change to rendering of release schedule ics file

2023-02-01 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hey Ben, we're parsing the ics files for schedule progress at the packager dashboard. However, I won't have access to my laptop (and the internet most of the time) before February 15th. Can you please postpone the change for a week? Thanks a lot! On Tue, Jan 31, 2023, 00:12 Ben Cotton wrote:

Re: Last known Good for Rawhide (Server Edition) -- Not Good

2022-12-10 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
o/ , Please note that "last known good" for rawhide nightlies actually means that it installs to VM, not via usb. Thanks for the report though, either myself early next week or somebody else will try this, it might be an actual bug of something specific about your configuration. Just to be sure,

Re: new criterion proposal: Graphical package managers

2021-11-08 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:05 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > "dnf install foo bar" > This is a single operation, comparable to having multiple packages installed via graphical package manager, not scheduling multiple operations at once. It would be the same If a graphical package manager offered to selec

Re: new criterion proposal: Graphical package managers

2021-11-04 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021, 11:40 Kamil Paral wrote: > I'm not sure if you understood it correctly (or if I even expressed it > correctly). The operations are of course executed sequentially, always > (that's how our package managers work). But they can be *scheduled* > concurrently, i.e. you can instal

Re: new criterion proposal: Graphical package managers

2021-11-03 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:32 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > ~~ > The default graphical package manager for a given software type must > appropriately: > * install, remove and update software, even if multiple operations are > scheduled sequentially or concurrently > I am definitely against bloc

Re: [Proposal] The dual monitor set-up criterion (Final Version)

2021-04-21 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Works for me, nice and simple. Thanks! On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:49 PM Geoffrey Marr wrote: > LGTM! Good work Lukas. > > Geoff Marr > IRC: coremodule > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 2:32 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > >> Hello friends of Fedora, >> >> please see the final version of the dual monitor c

Re: [Proposal] Test Cases for the Fedora Audio Test Day.

2021-02-22 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:43 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Some of them can be run in a VM for sure, but you might run into unknown > waters when it comes to using USB external sound cards and some kind of > application sound routing, because you might not be able to simulate that > in the VM, where

Re: Proposal to modify: Working Sound Beta Release Criterion

2021-01-29 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
> On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 14:55 +0100, Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > Ok, after an offline part of discussion with @Kamil Paral > > , we both have agreed that: > > > > > >1. The beta criterion for *Working sound *should remain as is now (no > >change needed). > >2. We would like to intro

Re: Proposal to Modify: Testcase dualboot with macOS

2021-01-20 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:56 PM Geoffrey Marr wrote: > Hi all, > > I have spent the last two days experimenting with Fedora 33 on a 2017 12" > Macbook (Macbook10,1). Unlike some previous Macs I have installed Fedora > on, out-of-the box peripheral support is fantastic. I didn't have to > install

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

2020-09-22 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020, 07:37 Jaap Bosman wrote: > You know the page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_USB_fmw > wants us to upgrade/download sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing > --refresh --best install mediawriter > > that will not install the required testing version (4.0.95) > > bu

Re: Request for Fedora QA team information

2020-09-04 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
LGTM, thanks for putting it together Adam! On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 20:54 Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 12:17 AM Adam Williamson < > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 14:31 -0400, David Cantrell wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > The Fedora Council is work

Re: Can dxvk be turned on/off per app?

2020-08-14 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:39 AM Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I'm not interested in creating a github account and it looks like one > is required to report problems. > Okay, I (might) be able to test that game/report issues to the dxvk tracker sometime next week. > I ended up using alternatives to

Re: Can dxvk be turned on/off per app?

2020-08-14 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:50 AM Bruno Wolff III wrote: > The next dxvk enhancement for wine broke Sin of the Solar Empire - > Rebellion > (GoG's version) for me, but works for some other games. Right now I've > turned it off for everything, but I'd like to only turn it off for games > that have a

Re: Proposal refinement of the late blocker exception

2020-04-17 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:56 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > I think this: > "If the release is declared no-go, the bug loses last minute status." > should be part of our policy. I considered it obvious, but I'm sure some > people (/me looking at Frantisek) would argue. Let's put it there. > I am agains

Fedora Easy Karma - Request for testing

2020-03-26 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hi, I've released updated fedora-easy-karma version yesterday with fixes for Bodhi >= 4 and some cleaning up of the code (dropped python2, old bodhi and yum support). Bodhi 5.2 fixed the issue server side (thanks!). You don't need to open updates page and give karma manually through bodhi webui,

Re: criterion proposal: prevent services timing out on system shutdown

2020-03-17 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:49 PM Dulaney wrote: > I can't recall, but, is podman included in a release blocking package set? > > I ask because it already fails to properly exit and is eventually > timed out. Podman fails this criteria for F31 (and presumably F32). > That said, I'm all for this cr

Re: criterion proposal: prevent services timing out on system shutdown

2020-03-17 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 15:34 Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 2:40 PM Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > >> >> Yeah, I'd prefer something like: >> *All system services present after installation with one of the >> release-blocking package sets must

Re: criterion proposal: prevent services timing out on system shutdown

2020-03-17 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 2:10 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:48 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > All system services present after installation with one of the > release-blocking package sets must not time out frequently or regularly > when they are being stopped during system rebo

Re: Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

2019-11-28 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 1:31 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > > 5. Once some kind of understanding of the issue is formed, a privileged > member (e.g. a member of @fedora-qa FAS group) can start the vote by > including a command in his comment, e.g. "START VOTE" on a separate line. > (Note that this is ju

Re: Gnome on F31: Qt applications cannot be fullscreened

2019-10-08 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Looks like QT apps using Wayland can't go fullscreen on GNOME Wayland session. As a workaround, you can set QT_QPA_PLATFORM=xcb . On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 12:25 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > Ran into another bug today while trying to watch netflix. Qt > applications cannot be full screened. >

[F31] Some updates waiting for testing

2019-09-05 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hi, as you all probably know, we are currently in F31 Beta Freeze.That means only updates fixing blocker bugs or those granted Freeze Exception status might be pushed to the stable repository. As we'll be deciding next Thursday if F31 Beta is ready to go[0], there are some updates pending to be

Re: Testing Branched F31 drop 0831

2019-09-01 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 6:04 PM pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > During the reboot after the install, the sad face saying "Oh no! > ..." appeared and the boot did not proceed further. > Yep, known and proposed as a blocker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746563 , related selinux part:

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

2019-08-26 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:53 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 2:42 PM Justin Forbes > wrote: > >> From my standpoint, ext4 and xfs are the primary supported root >> filesystems. I don't think that anything else should be release >> blocking. > > > If this is the case, we can expli

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Candidate Beta-1.8 Available Now!

2019-03-27 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
So, today, we went through 1.8 testing. Results of stuff (including installation tests of all release blocking images) that we retested are filled to the 1.8 result pages, I don't think it's necessary to copy over all remaining 1.4 results. We didn't find anything broken compared to 1.4, Firefox i

Re: Fedora Upgrade - release criteria update proposal

2018-11-18 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 6:43 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > If you follow exactly this procedure, the set of "the multilib packages > installed before" will be empty and you will not reproduce the issue at > hand. Multilib cruft has not been installed by default for years now! (And > that is a good thi

Fedora Upgrade - release criteria update proposal

2018-11-18 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
We have encountered a bug[0] which seemingly “broke” offline updates after systems were upgraded from an older Fedora to Fedora 29 and had some multilib packages installed. After the discussion at last week's Release Retrospective meeting, I am proposing some changes to our blocking criterions in o

Re: Unusable dnf after dnf system-upgrade to F29

2018-09-30 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
> > Can you try to delete this file? > /var/lib/dnf/history.sqlite > Maybe try to backup that file first, it might be useful for tracking down and fixing that bug. On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 5:20 PM Alessio Ciregia wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 1:55 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > >> Hiya, >> >> I upgra

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-13 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29. Dne pá 14. 9. 2018 8:03 uživatel Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky > wrote: > >> I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workst

GNOME: log in not possible/crash after update/upgrade

2018-05-02 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hi, today, I've updated my fedora (from 2018-04-17, with updates-testing). After reboot, I wasn't able to log in (session just crashed right after typing my password). The bug is already reported in BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573683 The reason of crash and actual fix for it i

Call for testing - auto-suspend on Live Media

2018-04-02 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hi, as you probably know, beginning with Fedora Workstation 28, auto-suspend will be enabled by default. This affects also live media. In our testing, some configurations were unable to resume after being suspended from live media[0]. I'd like to ask you to do some more testing, so we'll have more

Re: Not able to install Fed28: Secure Boot Violation

2018-03-16 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hi, the issue is already reported (although, I didn't check the clean install, just an upgrade, but I believe it is the same problem). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1555391 On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 5:46 PM, AV wrote: > This applies to an ASUS Zenbook with Fed27 installed using > UE

Introduction: František Zatloukal

2017-09-15 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
Hi, I am new member in Fedora QA. I've been involved in Fedora since ~2013 and I became Fedora Ambassador in 2015. Feel free to contact me on IRC (freenode/fedora-qa): frantisekz ; I am in Brno (CET) time zone. I am looking forward to make using Fedora better and more pleasant experience for its