On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 2:10 PM Ben Cotton <bcot...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:48 AM Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > All system services present after installation with one of the > release-blocking package sets must not time out frequently or regularly > when they are being stopped during system reboot/shutdown. > > > I like it generally, but I worry we'll get hung up on the definition > of "frequently" or "regularly". For shutdown in particular, I'm less > concerned with service timeouts (granted, I'm not paying for my > compute by the minute). I'm leaning toward something like > "predictably" or "reliably" (which is an awkward use of the word). > Basically, it's not a blocker unless it does it every time. > > Yeah, I'd prefer something like: *All system services present after installation with one of the release-blocking package sets must not time out every time when they are being stopped during system reboot/shutdown.* I like the general proposal, just different wording seems better. If timeout doesn't happen regularly, I won't block on it.
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
