On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:54 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> The release criteria aren't design documents. We're not defining the
> intended behavior, exactly; we're defining a certain subset of known
> expected behavior which we require to *work*.
>
> The situations you describe are, essentially, "
On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 18:20 -0500, John Mellor wrote:
>
> Ok, so would that allowance not violate 2 of the proposed criteria:
>
> 1. * The displayed state of software or software sources must not
> differ from their actual state. (E.g. an RPM package must not be
> shown as installed when
On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 14:17 -0500, John Mellor wrote:
> The suggested criteria list is pretty generic, and offhand I can't think
> of a current GUI or CLI installer that does not conform to these
> requirements.
Just before Fedora 35 was released, the KDE package manager did not
conform to sever
On 2022-01-21 5:54 p.m., Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 14:20 -0500, John Mellor wrote:
I am unclear from this proposal on what is supposed to happen if a
package is not completely installed. E.g: a powerdown or other outage
causes the post-install script in an installed rpm to n
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 15/225 (x86_64), 17/157 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed i
On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 17:54 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> This is another attempt at creating a new release criterion specific for
> graphical package managers. We already discussed it in November, but we
> couldn't agree easily on some particular details, and then I was gone for a
> long time:
> htt
On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 14:20 -0500, John Mellor wrote:
> >
> I am unclear from this proposal on what is supposed to happen if a
> package is not completely installed. E.g: a powerdown or other outage
> causes the post-install script in an installed rpm to not be run. A few
> packages like the
On 2022-01-20 11:54 a.m., Kamil Paral wrote:
This is another attempt at creating a new release criterion specific
for graphical package managers. We already discussed it in November,
but we couldn't agree easily on some particular details, and then I
was gone for a long time:
https://lists.fed
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220119.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220120.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 129
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 345.21 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 7:10 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> Thoughts? Is this an improvement? Anyone have a better idea? Thanks!
This is a definite improvement. I agree with Kamil's comment about
including the "graphically" wording. It might be unnecessarily
pedantic, but our future selves may app
On 1/20/22 19:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks! So I've had this action item at meetings forever now:
"adamw to try and clarify intent of "default application functionality"
criterion regarding arches"
For all release-blocking desktop / arch combinations, the following
applications mu
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:11 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hi folks! So I've had this action item at meetings forever now:
>
> "adamw to try and clarify intent of "default application functionality"
> criterion regarding arches"
>
> That's referring to
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_F
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220120.0):
ID: 1109861 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220120.0):
ID: 1109845 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
14 matches
Mail list logo
