On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:11 AM Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

> Hi folks! So I've had this action item at meetings forever now:
>
> "adamw to try and clarify intent of "default application functionality"
> criterion regarding arches"
>
> That's referring to
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Final_Release_Criteria#Default_application_functionality
> , which kinda reads at first glance like it's excluding Workstation
> aarch64, but that isn't the intent. The intent is that we require the
> specific list of application types to work on all release-blocking
> desktops and arches, including Workstation aarch64. Beyond that, we
> require *all* installed apps to work on Workstation x86_64.
>
> I think it'd be clearer if we write the criterion in the same order as
> my explanation above. So I propose we revise it to:
>
> ===
>
> For all release-blocking desktop / arch combinations, the following
> applications must start successfully and withstand a basic
> functionality test:
>
> * web browser
> * file manager
> * package manager
> * image viewer
> * document viewer
> * text editor
> * archive manager
> * terminal emulator
> * problem reporter
> * help viewer
> * system settings
>
> If there are multiple applications of the same type (e.g. several web
> browsers), the primary/default one must satisfy the requirements. If
> the primary/default application can't be determined, at least one of
> said applications must satisfy the requirements.
>
> Additionally, for Fedora Workstation on the x86_64 architecture,
> '''all''' applications installed by default must meet this requirement.
>
> ===
>
> Thoughts? Is this an improvement? Anyone have a better idea? Thanks!
>

Fine by me. I was considering just using some bold formatting in the
original version, but this might be still a bit better.

However, you dropped the "that can be launched using the standard graphical
mechanism" phrase used in the original version. I wonder if people might
then start arguing about applications which are installed but not visible
in the menu (there might be some, even though I don't have a concrete
example). Especially regarding the "all apps installed by default" part.
You might want to integrate the phrase also into the new version, or add a
footnote clarifying that only apps accessible "graphically" count. Or do
you think it's a non-issue?

Also please note that that section also contains:
"All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply
with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers
policy."
which should stay included, I believe. I assume you omitted it for
readability reasons. This would probably be kept at the very bottom, like
now.
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to