On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 7:10 PM Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Thoughts? Is this an improvement? Anyone have a better idea? Thanks!
This is a definite improvement. I agree with Kamil's comment about including the "graphically" wording. It might be unnecessarily pedantic, but our future selves may appreciate the clarity of intent. Perhaps: > Additionally, for Fedora Workstation on the x86_64 architecture, '''all''' > applications that are installed by default and can be launched using the > standard graphical mechanism must meet this requirement. We might make a similar edit to the "all combos" wording, too: > For all release-blocking desktop / arch combinations, the following graphical > applications must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test: This shows that we mean, for example, nautilus and not tar. Stylistically, I like the idea of making the list of application types and the examples given below into a table. That seems easier to understand, although I see arguments for leaving it as-is. I suggest this change, but will not lobby for it beyond this suggestion. :-) -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
