Hi there,
I hit a nasty bug with regards to OpenJDK 7 and GTK file requesters.
Currently the Sun Bugparade datase is having hiccups and it cannot display
bug reports (nevertheless it accepted my bug report and assigned it a bug#).
Despite this, I think I may have found a "way too similar" bug rep
Trying to start a netinstall with a ks file behind a proxy without luck.
url --url="http://.../"; --proxy=http://10.0.0.4:80
repo --name=testing --baseurl="http://.../"; --proxy=http://10.0.0.4:80
If I change consoles and export a http_proxy=http://10.0.0.4:80 I can wget
anything
just fine.
Any
On Tue, 1 May 2012 18:16:35 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
> I just went through the sizable list of F17 final blockers and found a
> bunch of things that need to be tested. If you have some spare cycles
> and/or are looking for stuff to test - please take a look at the bugs
> and suggested tests below.
I just went through the sizable list of F17 final blockers and found a
bunch of things that need to be tested. If you have some spare cycles
and/or are looking for stuff to test - please take a look at the bugs
and suggested tests below.
Thanks,
Tim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8
On 05/02/2012 06:54 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On fedora 16 if I type "reboot" in a terminal, there is a
> 7 second delay from when I hit enter to when shutdown messages
> start scrolling on my screen (I have rhgb turned off).
>
> On fedora 17 if I type "reboot" in a terminal, there is a
> 1 minute a
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 11:55 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I sorta do too. That's one of the reasons I started my
> "Game Of Linux" web pages :-).
Thanks for that. Now the Windows7 and Win7 system partitions don't
insist on appearing on my desktop.
Yes I kept Lose7 because it is the only easy way
Back in Fedora 16 we tried to advance the state of the art. We switched
to using GPT disklabels by default, and in many cases this worked just
fine. But it has become increasingly obvious that the hardware isn't
ready for us. We continue to get reports of boot problems related to
BIOS that attempt
> Anyone know what the heck is happening in those extra
> 90 seconds?
OK, I found an earlier thread about systemd hanging
on shutdown, and tried the experiment of doing
"sudo service network stop"
just before typing "reboot", and fedora 17 then
rebooted in about the same 7 seconds as fedora 16.
On fedora 16 if I type "reboot" in a terminal, there is a
7 second delay from when I hit enter to when shutdown messages
start scrolling on my screen (I have rhgb turned off).
On fedora 17 if I type "reboot" in a terminal, there is a
1 minute and 37 second delay between enter and shutdown
message
On Tue, 01 May 2012 15:51:08 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
> - xulrunner maybe shouldn't assert PRIMARY ownership in this case
That's the point for me: What on earth in the bookmarks
sidebar needs or wants the selection? And it is a super
long delay just in firefox.
I can run other apps that really
On Tue, 01 May 2012 14:46:23 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> I would like to propose
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809111 as a blocker or
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750794 as they are
> related. I am surprised that this hasn't been brought up already as
> I am unabl
I would like to propose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809111 as a
blocker or https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750794 as they are
related. I am surprised that this hasn't been brought up already as I am unable
to install to a software raid device. Am I using an unusual
On 5/1/12 1:49 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
I'm running dovecot on Fedora 16. I seem unable to create new IMAP
subfolders from clients; and this is possibly associated with the most
recent dovecot update on F16.
Yes I also ran into the above issue when I lost my backups (HD failed)
and had to reinst
==
#fedora-bugzappers: f17-final-blocker-review-2
==
We didn't quite get through all of the proposed blockers but it's a
start. Thanks to everyone who stepped up to help today!
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedorap
On 05/01/2012 08:18 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 01 May 2012 13:03:18 -0500
> John Morris wrote:
>
>> I depend on SMART being right
>> enough so I can usually yank a failing drive before it goes so bad the
>> worker can't login and use the machine.
>
> Of course, it was the SMART firmware on
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 14:22 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2012 14:11:15 -0400
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > In my experience, extremely slow FF performance is usually due to
> > writing out either the assorted sqlite data files in the profile
> > directory, or the big javascript pile
On Tue, 1 May 2012 14:11:15 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> In my experience, extremely slow FF performance is usually due to
> writing out either the assorted sqlite data files in the profile
> directory, or the big javascript pile that is the session storage.
I've got one really weird slowdown I
On Tue, 01 May 2012 13:03:18 -0500
John Morris wrote:
> I depend on SMART being right
> enough so I can usually yank a failing drive before it goes so bad the
> worker can't login and use the machine.
Of course, it was the SMART firmware on my Crucial SSD drive
that made it break after 5184 hours
Jonathan Kamens (j...@kamens.us) said:
> I restarted Firefox many times. I restarted gnome-shell. I restarted
> my machine. Nothing helped. Performance was poor immediately after
> the restart. There was no perceivable degradation over time -- it
> was extremely poor right from when it started up
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:04 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> How old is the drive? That model number says 3-platter, 320MB, SATA.
> If it's three or more years old, then just replace it. A new drive
> is $90 or less in US, and 500GB is available for the same price
> and same other specs (size, power,
On 5/1/2012 1:53 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
IMHO it was the restart that "fixed" it. I experience this "getting
slow" think to happen for a long time. After several days of run,
firefox needs to be restarted. 1. it's taking too much RAM, 2. usually
causing higher CPU load than after restart with sa
On Tue, 1 May 2012, Pedro Francisco wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
I thought I would try moving my profile out of the way to see if performance
would improve, so I shut down Firefox and moved ~/.mozilla/firefox/*.default
somewhere else. But then when I tried to r
> > I'm running dovecot on Fedora 16. I seem unable to create new IMAP
> > subfolders from clients; and this is possibly associated with the most
> > recent dovecot update on F16.
>
> Yes I also ran into the above issue when I lost my backups (HD failed)
> and had to reinstall a workstation.
I
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> I thought I would try moving my profile out of the way to see if performance
> would improve, so I shut down Firefox and moved ~/.mozilla/firefox/*.default
> somewhere else. But then when I tried to restart Firefox, it said that it
> was alr
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 09:31 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> I am using NFS (v4) home directories. The server is running Fedora 16;
> the client is running Fedora 17. Recently, when running Evolution on
> the client, I find that Evolution becomes completely unresponsive if I
> attempt to compos
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 09:37 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> I'm running dovecot on Fedora 16. I seem unable to create new IMAP
> subfolders from clients; and this is possibly associated with the most
> recent dovecot update on F16.
>
> I'm not 100% sure on this: I don't try to create new subfo
well Jonathan Kamens you are bit lucky :) because i dont see any
major changes after doing the same it's still slow
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 5/1/2012 10:28 AM, David wrote:
>
> The major of the 'Firefox is slow' problems are caused by misbehaving
> themes and
On 5/1/2012 10:28 AM, David wrote:
The major of the 'Firefox is slow' problems are caused by misbehaving
themes and extensions and the the 'remnants' that some of them leave in
the configuration files.
Yes, I'm aware of that, but that doesn't explain why moving my entire
~/.mozilla/firefox direc
On 5/1/2012 10:14 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 01 May 2012 09:50:22 -0400
> Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
>> Does anybody have any thoughts?
>
> My only thought is that firefox became popular mainly because
> it wasn't a slow bloated mess, now it has evolved into a slow
> bloated mess, and chrome
Hi
Jonathan Kamens
i am facing the same problems with firefox 12.0 in fedora 16 x86_64 it
takes more then
10 seconds to open and more then 5 secs to open a new tab
well i didn't tried anything fix it yet but i will also try to do the same hope
it will fix some issues
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:20
On Tue, 01 May 2012 09:50:22 -0400
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Does anybody have any thoughts?
My only thought is that firefox became popular mainly because
it wasn't a slow bloated mess, now it has evolved into a slow
bloated mess, and chrome is becoming popular because it isn't
a slow bloated mess
Hi everyone,
I was seeing really, really poor performance from Firefox. I'm not sure
exactly when it started being a problem, but it was going on for at
least a week and I certainly saw it with Firefox 12 (in F17 x86_64).
I thought I would try moving my profile out of the way to see if
perfo
On 4/29/12 3:24 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
Did an upgrade from F16 to current F17 tree + updates on my server and
all seemed well.
Except for dovecot..which after the upgrade, it seemed to error on my
client side (via imap) about namespace and inbox=yes and no namespace or
something along those li
I am using NFS (v4) home directories. The server is running Fedora 16;
the client is running Fedora 17. Recently, when running Evolution on
the client, I find that Evolution becomes completely unresponsive if I
attempt to compose a message. (It freezes up before showing the new
message windo
Compose started at Tue May 1 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(
On 05/01/2012 12:06 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/5/1 Ed Greshko :
>> On 05/01/2012 05:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> The same thing happens for me in F16 with
>>
>> Opppsss... It wasn't the same thing. It was actually a configuration error.
>> gmplayer seemed to have defaulted to trying to use
2012/5/1 Ed Greshko :
> On 05/01/2012 05:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> The same thing happens for me in F16 with
>
> Opppsss... It wasn't the same thing. It was actually a configuration error.
> gmplayer seemed to have defaulted to trying to use libvdpau_nvidia.so which
> doesn't
> exist on my sys
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, stan wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:21:08 -0400
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:26:39 +0200
>> Karel Volný wrote:
>>
>> > I hope there doesn't exist one more step before like "in previous
>> > iteration, users were bad to us, so let's break some f
On 05/01/2012 05:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> The same thing happens for me in F16 with
Opppsss... It wasn't the same thing. It was actually a configuration error.
gmplayer seemed to have defaulted to trying to use libvdpau_nvidia.so which
doesn't
exist on my system.
Working now for mebut I
On 05/01/2012 05:43 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 11:09 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 05/01/2012 04:59 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> did somebody try to play a video DVD (VIDEO_TS) by *gmplayer*? I'm
>>> successful in playing the DVD with *"mplayer /dev/sr0"* (picture is
>>> s
On 05/01/2012 11:09 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 04:59 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> did somebody try to play a video DVD (VIDEO_TS) by *gmplayer*? I'm
>> successful in playing the DVD with *"mplayer /dev/sr0"* (picture is
>> shown), but using gmplayer with /dev/sr0 as device only
On 05/01/2012 04:59 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did somebody try to play a video DVD (VIDEO_TS) by *gmplayer*? I'm
> successful in playing the DVD with *"mplayer /dev/sr0"* (picture is
> shown), but using gmplayer with /dev/sr0 as device only plays sound :-(
>
> Installed:
>
> mplayer-1.0-0
On 05/01/2012 10:59 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did somebody try to play a video DVD (VIDEO_TS) by *gmplayer*? I'm
> successful in playing the DVD with *"mplayer /dev/sr0"* (picture is
> shown), but using gmplayer with /dev/sr0 as device only plays sound :-(
>
> Installed:
>
> mplayer-1.
Hi,
did somebody try to play a video DVD (VIDEO_TS) by *gmplayer*? I'm
successful in playing the DVD with *"mplayer /dev/sr0"* (picture is
shown), but using gmplayer with /dev/sr0 as device only plays sound :-(
Installed:
mplayer-1.0-0.135.20120205svn.fc17.x86_64
mplayer-gui-1.0-0.135.20120205sv
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 21:39 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Strange... here it is called libreoffice-ure, and should not get updated by
> any OOo stuff. Perhaps there is something eles that uses it?
Both Fedora openoffice.org and the original upstream openoffice.org
ended up with a package call
45 matches
Mail list logo
