Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 22-Mar-100 Re: [techtalk] html editors by Mari [EMAIL PROTECTED] > No, sorry... Writing HTML from scratch using emacs has filled all my > needs so far :-) Emacs psgml mode is great! Commands to insert an element and the required sub-elements, complete a tag name, automa

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread dez
Thanx.. I didnt know they made one!!! ill check it out ( tho..i must admit I did try it a long time ago for windows and wasnt to impressed BUT that was then and this is NOW !!) cheerz dez > Coffeecup for Linux (www.coffeecup.com) is pretty good, and doesn't add > excessive code that isn't needed

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Eito Katagiri
Hi dez, [Also, hi to everybody since this is my first post.] Have you tried Bluefish? If not, check out: http://bluefish.linuxbox.com/ (You need Gtk+ library and Imlib. I assume that you are using GNOME on Linux, so you should be able to install binary package and run it.) :eito On Wed,

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Tami Friedman
s the correct end tag, insert an attribute, etc. I use it to do DocBook, ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:02:27AM -0500 or thereabouts, Laurel Fan wrote: > > Emacs psgml mode is great! Commands to insert an element and the > required sub-elements, complete a tag name, automatically insert > the correct end tag, insert an attribute, etc. I use it to do DocBook, > and have

[techtalk] Outlook woes

2000-03-22 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:27:12PM +0800 or thereabouts, dez wrote: > thanx ..jeff..BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment which i > thought was odd... > so thats what mine were doing eh? > yep i agree...dont get me started on outlook ...owww [snip] > dez > - Original Mes

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Caitlyn M. Martin
dez wrote: > So I take it that you have no suggestions of a similar HTML editor for linux > like Hotdog ??? > Hi, Well... I've never used Hotdog, so I can't compare, but I've found three I can use and like reasonably well. The simplest, and IMHO, the best, especially if you basically do raw co

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Julia Frizzell
At 11:44 PM -0800 3/21/00, Jeff wrote: >On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:27:12PM +0800, dez wrote: > > thanx ..jeff..BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment which i > > thought was odd... > >Yeah, mine does that on purpose, except it isn't html; it is a PGP >signature. yes, however, ANY at

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if dez > thanx ..jeff..BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment which i > thought was odd... Well to be picky, the first text part of Jeff's messages should have 'Content-Disposition: inline' in the envelope, to tell the MUA that this part should be viewed automatically. In practice,

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if dez > Can anyone suggest a great ( note not good but great *grin*) > html editor..for those with win experiance I'd like something akin to > hotdog pro.. I suggest doing layout by hand, to ensure correct rendering in graphical, text and speech browsers. I also suggest using style sheets for

[techtalk] Mailing list

2000-03-22 Thread chucky allen
Hi there. . .my mail server is overcome with mail for my account. . .would you kindly remove me from your mailing list.    Thanx , Çhuckÿ®

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Julia Frizzell > > yes, however, ANY attachment is bad form on a mailing list. I REALLY > don't like having my attachments folder fill up with Untitled, > Untitled 1, Untitled 2, etc. Um, then get a less brain-dead mail client. Rik ___ techtal

Re: [techtalk] html editors: Amaya

2000-03-22 Thread Margaret Leber
Jeff wrote: > Has anyone suggested Amaya yet? Now, admittedly, I haven't used it, but > in my search for The-Perfect-Browser-That-Doesn't-Exist-Yet... I've used Amaya. It's halfway decent, although there are the occasional odd IU idioms you have to use to do what seem like perfectly ordinary th

[techtalk] SB Live! and SiS 5597 on linux

2000-03-22 Thread m d
This is my first posting, so forgive me if this is a worn-out question. Can I get SB Live! to work under linux? I'm using Redhat 6.0 on a Pentium. Windows98 is also loaded. I'm also having an annoying problem with the monitor in X. If I run in 1024x768, I get a default bit depth of 8. It

[techtalk] more "trying to track down egroups.com stuff" mail (ignore)

2000-03-22 Thread Deb Richardson
hoo hoo. - deb -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

Re: [techtalk] those bloody "moderator" messages

2000-03-22 Thread Amanda Babcock
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Deb Richardson wrote: >It appears that someone has subscribed techtalk to a moderated list at >egroups.com. I thought that someone had subscribed the moderated egroups list to techtalk. As evidence, so far only people who have posted to one of the linxchix lists (techtalk I

[techtalk] Raid and IMAP

2000-03-22 Thread moebius
Hey All, I don't know if I'm just thinking to much about this but hopefully someone can help. I want to setup a software raid for mail users to boost I/O while reading the disks. The users can access the mail either thru TWIG or pine/elm. My question is this, which filesystem to put on the rai

Re: [techtalk] Raid and IMAP

2000-03-22 Thread Robert Siemer
Hi! From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I want to setup a software raid for mail users to boost > I/O while reading the disks. > My question is this, which filesystem to put on the raid. I was initally > thinking /var/spool/mail b/c this (I think) is where all new mail is > stored. Then I started thi

RE: [techtalk] outlook

2000-03-22 Thread Sally_Hutchinson
#if Jeff >It sent the html as an attachment... ugh. I won't start about Outlook Hey now, bear in mind that some of us are subscribed at work and don't have a CHOICE!!! -Sally Unhappily leashed to NT and MS Office til 5pm each day ___ techtalk m

[techtalk] Testing

2000-03-22 Thread Steve Howes
Just to see what I can see -- Steve - Cheltenham, UK - In love and light we are In darkness we are no less ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

Re: [techtalk] outlook

2000-03-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > #if Jeff > >It sent the html as an attachment... ugh. I won't start about Outlook > > Hey now, bear in mind that some of us are subscribed at work and don't have > a CHOICE!!! Whoah, took me a few seconds there to realise that I didn't write this. I don't know, y

Re: [techtalk] Outlook woes

2000-03-22 Thread Jeramia Ory
> Actually, a brilliant FAQ entry would be: > I have mailer XYZ. How do I... > o Make it do lines of 72 or so characters? > o Stop it putting the quoted message at the bottom? > o Stop it defaulting to "HTML mail" or multipart mime stuff? As a user of Outlook Express 5.0 for Mac here in the l

[techtalk] X/windowmaker

2000-03-22 Thread Nicole Zimmerman
Allrighty so after some trials and tribulations with X and it's fonts (everything came up like barcodes), I have X and WindowMaker up and running on a 2nd computer... video card is an ATI rage 128, using xserver-svga (X doesn't agree with it being a mach 64, that's fine with me) on xfree 3.3.6-5.

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Jeff
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:38:30AM -0500, Julia Frizzell wrote: > At 11:44 PM -0800 3/21/00, Jeff wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:27:12PM +0800, dez wrote: > > > thanx ..jeff..BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment which i > > > thought was odd... > > > >Yeah, mine does that on

[techtalk] Apache redirects

2000-03-22 Thread Yvonne
I'm not sure this is appropriate to this list...In setting up Apache on my server, I was going through documentation and read through the Redirect and RedirectTemp directives. Is there a reason to configure these directives for a redirect in Apache itself, rather than using a simple html redirect?

Re: [techtalk] SB Live! and SiS 5597 on linux

2000-03-22 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 22-Mar-100 [techtalk] SB Live! and SiS.. by "m d"@hotmail.com > This is my first posting, so forgive me if this is a worn-out question. > Can I get SB Live! to work under linux? I'm using Redhat 6.0 on a > Pentium. Windows98 is also loaded. Yes. There is a driver at ht

Re: [techtalk] Raid and IMAP

2000-03-22 Thread moebius
Hey Robert, Below are the specs > What do you want to speed up? Or better, what is to slow for your > needs? Where do you think is more perfermance possible? Well, it seems that in mail/IMAP generally the bottleneck is always disk I/O. I am hoping to gain performance from a SCSI software raid

[techtalk] RE: problem unsubscribing

2000-03-22 Thread Karoline Emilie Altman
still getting messages -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Deb Richardson Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: problem unsubscribing should be fixed now. - deb Karoline Emilie Altman wrote: > > A

[techtalk] Sorry another test - please ignore

2000-03-22 Thread Steve Howes
-- Steve - Cheltenham, UK - In love and light we are In darkness we are no less ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Jeff
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 09:29:36PM +, Steve Howes wrote: > Jeff wrote: > > Um, no. I use it to identify myself in my email. I personally believe > > that we all should be using encryption in email, so we can have some > > form of authentication. You can get PGPi or GPG (which I will be > >

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread dez
Steve quipped:>>> . I REALLY > > > don't like having my attachments folder fill up with Untitled, > > > Untitled 1, Untitled 2, etc. > > > > > ***Funnyon mine all of your messages (jeff) are coming thru as 2 attachments.. no actual message in the main which means I have to open the attachment

[techtalk] Shell Scripts

2000-03-22 Thread Lisa Dickson
Trying to learn more about shell scripts. Examples would be of great benefit as would site recommendations. Any tips are appreciated. Lisa ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

authentication (Was: Re: [techtalk] html editors)

2000-03-22 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 22-Mar-100 Re: [techtalk] html editors by Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] > But isn't there a time and place for authentication? > Seems a little OTT for a 'public' mailing list. Why? Authentication is no less important in a public forum. It prevents someone from forging an em

[techtalk] How do I setup a Linux Firewall to access an NT file server

2000-03-22 Thread sandyj
How do I setup a Linux Firewall to re-direct access to an NT file server? I am trying to use an NT4 machine through a 3'rd nic ... Re:Subnet Do I need to use Squid or something like it? The firewall script I am using sees the 3'rd card as a connection to block even though it's IP address is

Re: [techtalk] Outlook woes

2000-03-22 Thread dez
YES PLEEEAE! :) (nb: not quite a shout but a yelp of pain and begging ...:)) dez > > Would it help anyone if I get her to describe how to force it to > behave itself? Or is there someone on the list who knows how and > who can summarise? > > Actually, a brilliant FAQ entry would be:

[techtalk] HTML --thanx to all.............

2000-03-22 Thread dez
Thanx to all who posted suggestions regarding a linux html editor .. tho starting out as a simple request it became much more. It seemed to become a forum for "by hand versus an editor" >From the posts there is the general conception that if you use an editor you are not "coding by hand" T

Re: [techtalk] html editors: Amaya

2000-03-22 Thread dez
> > in my search for The-Perfect-Browser-That-Doesn't-Exist-Yet... > ..Have you tried Opera ??? it is alpha ( maybe even beta by now ) for linux...and although I didnt like the way everything was in one window ( you could often accidentaly close the damn thing in the middle

Re: [techtalk] Shell Scripts

2000-03-22 Thread Dan Nguyen
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:16:08PM -0400, Lisa Dickson wrote: > Trying to learn more about shell scripts. Examples would be of great > benefit as would site recommendations. Any tips are appreciated. > Here's a presentation given by one of the member at the local lug. http://www.msu.edu/~pfaf

Re: [techtalk] Shell Scripts

2000-03-22 Thread Jeff
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:16:08PM -0400, Lisa Dickson wrote: > Trying to learn more about shell scripts. Examples would be of great > benefit as would site recommendations. Any tips are appreciated. Ok, I'm going to tell you to RTFM, *grin* Actually, seriously, the best place to look is in

[techtalk] my last message...

2000-03-22 Thread Jeff
I did send the one about the shell scripts. I messed up on the signing (I temporarily turned it off to be a little nicer to someone I was communicating with offlist, their mail client was being a pain in the ass about the attachments, it was Outlook...) -- Jeff -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Ve

[techtalk] RE: lunch, friday?

2000-03-22 Thread Andrew Kowal
Still checking. I will let you know. -A > -Original Message- > From: Deb Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 3:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: lunch, friday? > > > Hi there. > > Left you voicemail, don't know if you'll get it...just checki

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Steve Howes
Jeff wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:38:30AM -0500, Julia Frizzell wrote: > > At 11:44 PM -0800 3/21/00, Jeff wrote: > > >On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:27:12PM +0800, dez wrote: > > > > thanx ..jeff..BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment which i > > > > thought was odd... > > >

[techtalk] RE: question

2000-03-22 Thread Phoebe Nikolakakis
e-mail is fine. Have you spoken to Patrice??? P. > -Original Message- > From: deb [mailto:deb]On Behalf Of Deb Richardson > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 12:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: question > > > Can I just email in that little resignation note, or do you need me to

[techtalk] Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours

2000-03-22 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
** ** THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY ** ** YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE ** ** The original message was received at Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:12:22 -0500 (EST) from [216.208.98.2