Jeff wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:38:30AM -0500, Julia Frizzell wrote:
> > At 11:44 PM -0800 3/21/00, Jeff wrote:
> > >On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:27:12PM +0800, dez wrote:
> > > > thanx ..jeff......BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment which i
> > > > thought was odd...
> > >
> > >Yeah, mine does that on purpose, except it isn't html; it is a PGP
> > >signature.
> >
> > yes, however, ANY attachment is bad form on a mailing list. I REALLY
> > don't like having my attachments folder fill up with Untitled,
> > Untitled 1, Untitled 2, etc.
> >
> > Please, remove the signature.
>
> Um, no. I use it to identify myself in my email. I personally believe
> that we all should be using encryption in email, so we can have some
> form of authentication. You can get PGPi or GPG (which I will be
> switching to in the next couple of weeks) for free -- PGPi for personal
> use, GPG is GPL'd.
>
But isn't there a time and place for authentication?
Seems a little OTT for a 'public' mailing list.
> As Rik put it, get a less braindead mail client. I have actually never
> seen a setup where the attachments all get dumped in their own folder.
> What are you using?
>
> --
> Jeff
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GCS/M/>P d-(pu) s+:- a17>? C++(++++) L+++ UL++++@>$ P+ E--- W++@ N+ o? K++ w--- O? M
>V- PS+ PE(--)@ Y+@ PGP++ t+ 5 X++@ R++@ !tv@ b++ DI++++ D- G e- h! r% y?
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>
> My Public Key -- http://24.5.73.229/pubkey.txt
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
--
Steve - Cheltenham, UK
---------
In love and light we are
In darkness we are no less
_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
