You can also use roles (depending on version of pine... if it is below
4.0 probably not). Roles will recognise a line in a header and form a
pre determined (by you) header
to base the response on.
I guess I don't see the point in manually editing it too many times...
kind of like code. If you ca
On Jan 14, V Clarke conjectured:
> I'd love to, but this version of Pine doesn't _have_ replyall. It prompts
> you when you hit reply; if you choose the replyall option, it replies to
> the sender with a CC to the mailing list; if not you only get the sender.
> It also prompts for reply-to header
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Jenn V. wrote:
> So I suspect it's a function of the end-user's mail. Do this experiment
> with the various lists you're on - see what you get when you hit
> reply/replyall.
I'd love to, but this version of Pine doesn't _have_ replyall. It prompts
you when you hit reply; if
You can set your reply to in pine. :o)
In your .pinerc you can add the line
customized-hdrs=Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can change all (well, all of the basics, safely) of your headers this
way, including your From: (that's what I do here when I'm telnet-ed in to
the university server).
-
V Clarke wrote:
> However, asking about this on my local comp.advice newsgroup started an
> argument: one person said it's the list admin's responsibility, another
> said it's my job to filter them out, and yet a third wanted to know what
> the first two were on about and why on earth couldn't pe
That's interesting if you're getting doubles on this list. The reason is
because the message below includes a reply-to: header to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] In general, I think it's up to people's
preferences -- I generally prefer to get two messages so that one shows up
in my inbox, as it can take a litt