Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-11 Thread Dan McGarry
- Original Message - From: Emily Cartier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 7:49 AM Subject: Re: [techtalk] POP mail security > On Sat, 08 Jan 2000 18:52:29 +1100 > "Jenn V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-11 Thread Michael Carson
Emily Cartier wrote: > That's odd. When I use man, it usually acts as if it's piped through > less to begin with. More doesn't need a 'q' to end, but less does. On some systems, more is less. :) Either an alias or a symlink. C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-11 Thread Emily Cartier
On Sat, 08 Jan 2000 18:52:29 +1100 "Jenn V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Laurel Fan wrote: > > > > > If the asker does know how to do all of this, and is insulted, I'm > > sorry, but I'm glad you're insulted because you just wasted my time. > > Actually, you didn't waste your time - I d

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-08 Thread Robert Kiesling
"Jenn V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The list also specifically says not to tell people to RTFM. I appreciate > that that was not your intention, but I recall glancing at your answer and > thinking 'uh, that's perilously close to a blunt RTFM. A newbie is going to > be put off and upset by tha

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-08 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 8-Jan-100 Re: [techtalk] POP mail sec.. by "Jenn V."@simegen.com > if I know I'm planning to search a man page I pipe > it through less. I can save myself a step now. :) If you prefer less, you can set the environment variable PAGER to less. It can be set to anything, b

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-07 Thread Jenn V.
Laurel Fan wrote: > > If the asker does know how to do all of this, and is insulted, I'm > sorry, but I'm glad you're insulted because you just wasted my time. Actually, you didn't waste your time - I didn't realise 'man' was paged with 'more' typically - if I know I'm planning to search a ma

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-07 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 8-Jan-100 Re: [techtalk] POP mail sec.. by "Jenn V."@simegen.com > Presumably, since I /think/ the original requester wrote saying 'I looked > there', she didn't. Well, the original requester didn't say anything about having looked anywhere. Note that the original reque

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-07 Thread Jenn V.
Laurel Fan wrote: > I don't know where you get that I was telling her to search "useless > sources of information". I merely explained how I would go about > looking for that answer, and I think it was useful, since I found the > answer about 3 times, in one form or another. Presumably, since

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-07 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 7-Jan-100 RE: [techtalk] POP mail sec.. by "Linda Walsh"@sgi.com > I typed man on pop, pop3, imap and imap4 and they all came up > null. Would it help you if I pasted the relevant part of the fetchmail manpage? Would it help you if I said the manpage for fetchma

RE: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-07 Thread srl
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Linda Walsh wrote: > It so happens this whole bit of POP security was going through > my head as I was evaluating the idea of getting a service provider > email address in case I moved jobs. I requirement would be the ability > to automatically (perl script) pull the me

RE: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-07 Thread Linda Walsh
> -Original Message- > From: Laurel Fan > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 6:47 PM > To: Linux Ladies > Subject: Re: [techtalk] POP mail security > > > Most unix programs come with documentation. Usually this is in the form > of a man(ual) page. These c

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-06 Thread Chris J/#6
Try looking up about APOP authentication. Not all POP servers support it though, and I don't know what mail client support for APOP is like, but I think fetchmail is quite happy with it. APOP takes your username and password, and creates and md5 hash of the password and a timestamp returned b

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-05 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 5-Jan-100 [techtalk] POP mail security by Subba [EMAIL PROTECTED] > What is the best way to protect my users passwords from being sniffed? > Can a user use an encrypted tunnel to send the userid and password to > the pop server? Most unix programs come with documentation