On Sat, 08 Jan 2000 18:52:29 +1100 "Jenn V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Laurel Fan wrote: > > > > > If the asker does know how to do all of this, and is insulted, I'm > > sorry, but I'm glad you're insulted because you just wasted my time. > > Actually, you didn't waste your time - I didn't realise 'man' was paged > with 'more' typically - if I know I'm planning to search a man page I pipe > it through less. I can save myself a step now. :) That's odd. When I use man, it usually acts as if it's piped through less to begin with. More doesn't need a 'q' to end, but less does. Emily (maybe I'm misinterpreting here) ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- [techtalk] POP mail security Subba Rao
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail security Laurel Fan
- RE: [techtalk] POP mail security Linda Walsh
- RE: [techtalk] POP mail security srl
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail security Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail security Jenn V.
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail security Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail securi... Jenn V.
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail se... Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail se... Emily Cartier
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail se... Michael Carson
- [techtalk] man, more or le... Telsa Gwynne
- Re: [techtalk] man, more o... Karl-Heinz Zimmer
- Re: [techtalk] man, more o... Telsa Gwynne
- Re: [techtalk] man, more o... Karl-Heinz Zimmer
- Re: [techtalk] man, more o... Telsa Gwynne
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail se... Dan McGarry
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail security Robert Kiesling
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail security Chris J/#6