Claudine Chionh wrote:
> One of the problems changing from pine to mutt was that the keybindings
> are quite different, especially the keys used to select/tag and apply
> commands to tagged messages. It didn't take me long to get used to
> mutt's keybindings, so when I'm stuck somewhere else w
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:21:35AM +1200, penguina sed:
> I'm a bit concerned about running fetchmail over an outside network,
> though -- it doesn't encrypt, does it? Is there a way to set up
> fetchmail (or other mail clients that have that functionality built
> in) so that it *does* encrypt bo
On Friday, 08 June 2001, Penguina scripsit,
> I use pine, and I can tell you a few things I really don't like
> about it. ^X (send) and ^C (cancel) are right next to each other.
I'll tell you what's silly - I was just fixing up my procmail recipes
and sent a whole bunch of mail into a 'Linixc
It will depend on the controller. You'll probably want to call them and
ask if they can tell you for sure which card you would get with the
machine, and then look on the net.
SCSI in general is A-OK, but some adapters are more supported than others.
--m
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Nancy Corbett wrot
I'm the new, proud owner of an unusual
little beast: a sco unix box.
Unfortunately, I have no information about
the previous logins. (I bought this at a
bankruptcy sale for $100)
My question is what is the sco unix equiv
of 'linux single' so I can get into this thing?
Thanks!
Walt
-~
La
If you have real trouble, you could always get an IDE drive, connect it to
the PCI IDE interface, and use that for your boot & system stuff.
9 GB isn't much for multimedia applications, if that's what you want
to use it for (one of the few justifications for SCSI Ultra160) and
you'll want dedic
Encryption has to be supported on the server side, SPOP or something,
doesn't it?
Someone gave a talk at our LUG last year about itbuncha stuff about
handing out the keys and keeping the keyserver and the pop server talking
?? I don't remember all the details, and I can't place the li
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:21:35AM +1200, Penguina wrote:
> I use pine, and I can tell you a few things I really don't like
> about it. ^X (send) and ^C (cancel) are right next to each other.
>
> If you let things build up in your inbox, pine takes ages to sort
> it out on launch. It has gotten
Bettina Gille Makes SourceForge Top Ten Users
http://sourceforge.net/
http://www.phpgroupware.org/developers.php
If only it were in Zope/Python...
___
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Heya --
Quoth Walt:
> I'm the new, proud owner of an unusual little beast: a sco unix box.
> Unfortunately, I have no information about the previous logins. (I
> bought this at a bankruptcy sale for $100). My question is what is
> the sco unix equiv of 'linux single' so I can get into this thing
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Kelly McQuarrie wrote:
> Hi Claudine:
>
> I've been using pine since I switch to unix so I can't compare it to
> anything else. Why do you like mutt better? Maybe I should switch?
>
> -Kelly
I use pine, and I can tell you a few things I really don't like
about it. ^X (sen
Hmm... Not as elegant as "linux single" but if you pull out the drive
and stick it in a Linux box, you should be able to mount it and change
the root password...
C.
Walt wrote:
> I'm the new, proud owner of an unusual
> little beast: a sco unix box.
>
> Unfortunately, I have no information
I am looking at buying the computer described below, and one of the guys
at work says that I will have all kinds of problems installing Linux on it
because of the SCSI hard drive. Is this true? I'm not a hardware person
at all and have never installed Linux on a computer from the ground up
like
At 02:28 PM 6/7/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>I use realaudio quite a bit, and my Linux box runs it MUCH better. Not
>only do I never lose my connections, but I get 3X the bandwidth. This
>is vs. Win98, though, not Win2K.
It makes a HUGE difference and I have tried it on Win 2K and 98.
I also tried an
>web pages, cgi... I think these type of situations are subjective to >its
>environment. Because typically a web master is responsible for >"nuts and
>bolts"-server, services, development.
Thanks for responding (and to everyone else who has responded too!)
I've been wondering about this, too-
My experience:
Well I am a sys admin for a smaller company, the sole responsibilty of all, but we do have 6 servers, one of which is a web
server running various sites. We do little DB "stuff", but when we have I have only resposible that the OS and Web server is
running and that the DB can ta
Hi Kelly and others,
On Wednesday, 06 June 2001, Kelly McQuarrie scripsit,
> I've been using pine since I switch to unix so I can't compare it to
> anything else. Why do you like mutt better? Maybe I should switch?
Hmm, I changed from pine to mutt over a year ago, so my comparisons are
based
Yvonne:
> Hi, all. I'm unlurking here... Here is a question for anyone who deals
> with the web in some way in their system administration job...
> actually, for any sysadmin... If you are the system administrator over
> a (web) server, do you administer
> all the services on that box? Including
18 matches
Mail list logo
