At 19:48 16/08/00, Conor Daly wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 08:15:13AM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
> Conor Daly thought...
> > Anyone know how a bash / csh script can tell if it was called in a
> pipeline or
> > directly from the commandline? I've a script that I want to run either
as blogs go I think slashdot is quite good.. it's forums are also good
places to find mirrors to sites/info/etc that has been slashdoted or
otherwhise has been taken down.. and to occasionaly find related links...
I had thought of writting a slashdot url leacher that would grab every
forum entry t
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 12:54:03PM -0400 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Lilly S. thought...
> Hi all,
>
> I was so happy yesterday when I found a copy of Mandrake's Linux for
> Windows. So all excitedly i bought it and went home to install it. And
> that's when I ran into trouble.
>
> Here's
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 08:15:13AM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Conor Daly thought...
> Anyone know how a bash / csh script can tell if it was called in a pipeline or
> directly from the commandline? I've a script that I want to run either by
> catting a file through a pipe or by invok
The reason it bugged me was because it was in the general sentiment of
"you think you're so hot with your Linux OS, well, it sucks, and here's
someone who backs me up.".
Nyeah!
L.
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:00:56 -0400 (EDT), "Lilly S." <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi - I am a newbie in need !
We upgraded to Red Hat 6.2 (from 5.0) and now our cron jobs aren't
running. The cron log file isn't showing any errors - in fact it looks
like everything is running - only it isn't - nothing is executing. I
have tried restarting crond but I don't know what else to do
My PPP connection is working fine. However, when it runs, it executes ip-up
script twice. I am not able to figure out why it is running twice. The man pages
for pppd did not help.
Any pointers on how to fix this minor issue appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
--
Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
> >And slashdot is not "the Linux community." Please.
>
> I know that. Tell Fred that (I did).
>
I don't care to tell Fred anything. ;-)
> Slashdot has done a great deal to harm the public image of Linux, if
> you ask me.
>
Agreed. I don't even read it anymore. I don't need to.
I've iden
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 18:03:20 -0400, Brendan Coffey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>And slashdot is not "the Linux community." Please.
I know that. Tell Fred that (I did).
Slashdot has done a great deal to harm the public image of Linux, if
you ask me.
Kelly
_
His questinable technical literacy notwithstanding, Fred DOES parrot
some good points that others have made. Linux and NT are both
still far, far (that's FAR) behind the BSDs in terms of reliability,
stability, and security.
And slashdot is not "the Linux community." Please.
-b
---
On Wed, 1
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:00:56 -0400 (EDT), "Lilly S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>than when someone sends me this article:
>http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/FredMoody/moody.html
Well, to be frank, Fred has some valid points.
* Linux is not very well designed from a security standpoint. (A
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:24:15 -0400, "C. M. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Oh, absolutely. Specific host routes shouldn't be necessary, though
>I've tried them just in case. The .56 is not a valid address on our
>network, though, which is what raised the red flag.
No, it's not a valid addre
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:14:21 -0400, "C. M. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>The IP address assigned to eth0 is correct in ifconfig, but
>wrong/different in netstat. Ditto eth1.
No, they appear to be correct to me. Keep in mind that those are
network routes, not host routes.
Kelly
___
than when someone sends me this article:
http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/FredMoody/moody.html
Lilly
___
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Im not sure what you are asking, but are you asking for examples of questions that may
be on the exam? There are study guides for taking these exams. Shouldn't your mark be
determined on your ability
to manipulate RH Linux and not your ability to manipulate the test questions? Food for
thaught
Hi, Malcolm,
>
> Notice the field labelled "Mask:" in the second row? This means that you
> have been assigned a group of eight IP addresses where the top 29 bits
> of the address are set (248 is 1000 in binary). So, in other words,
> you are on a subnet and the individual IPs of the machines
OK, I'm responding to this particular message in the thread because it's
got all the information I need to refer to. I've read the later messages
and think I understand some of where Caity's confusion is coming from...
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 05:20:31PM -0400, C. M. Martin wrote:
> eth0 Link
There is a workaround for NetBIOS authentication thru NAT..
I'm not sure if it was this list I already posted the link on..
here it is again if I have:
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/print/1159/
/"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campai
Netbios has some "features" that make it difficult to NAT esp. if your
using windows Domains or WINS...
to properly utilize this "feature" to your advantage check out:
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/print/1159/
/"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\ / ASCI
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, C. M. Martin wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
>
> All is working here now.
Congratulations. You must be pretty relieved.
> The opinion of the engineer I was working with is that the first
> netstat entry *is* wrong, since the address is outside the bounds of
> our network,
The
Hi all,
I was so happy yesterday when I found a copy of Mandrake's Linux for
Windows. So all excitedly i bought it and went home to install it. And
that's when I ran into trouble.
Here's the current setup.
I have two harddrives A and B (that's not the drive's names).
A (11 Gigs) has two partit
Hi, everyone,
All is working here now. The opinion of the engineer I was working with is
that the first netstat entry *is* wrong, since the address is outside the
bounds of our network, but it isn't affecting anything, and my attempts to
delete and correct the entry with the route command fail.
I might be talking under your level, but yeah, you can do something like
route add default gw xxx.xx.xxx.xxx
or
route add ()
or
route delete
as i said, i'm not real swift at this stuff but it's a big rush when it actually
works. hope this helps...
"C. M. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Well I shutoff Reverse and ident lookups and now it works in Windows (It
still takes a while to login but once its in its fast).
here is the tracert:
C:\WINDOWS\Desktop>tracert 192.168.0.3
Tracing route to 192.168.0.3 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 1 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.0.3
Trace
Hi, Stephanie, and everyone else,
> But can't the routing table hold not necessarily the machine itself, but a router
>the machine knows about?
Oh, absolutely. Specific host routes shouldn't be necessary, though I've tried
them just in case. The .56 is not a valid address on our network, thou
But can't the routing table hold not necessarily the machine itself, but a router the
machine knows about? you can have a gateway that matches your ip, but the destination
doesn't have to. I think a crash course in routing is in order...I can usually hack
this stuff together, but never quite
Hi, everyone,
OK, here is what my problem has boiled down to, and I'm not sure if it's a
Linux issue or an NT issue, but I think it's Linux/firewall. I have an NT
Terminal Server on the DMZ and everything else behind the firewall. I am using
ipchains/ip masquerading to control outbound traffic
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> C. M. Martin, [EMAIL PROTECTED], said:
> > Those first two destination addresses are *wrong*. How can netstat,
> > which I believe reads directly from the kernel routing tables, get
> > out of sync with ifconfig? More importantly, how on earth do I fix
> > this?
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Kath wrote:
> Very interesting.
>
> I increased the timeout delay and was able to login to the ftp in Windows,
> but it was quite slow. A refresh of a directory could take upwards of 30
> seconds and this is across a 100 Mbps LAN with no traffic on it.
What does tracert te
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Kath wrote:
> Yes I've run portscans on it and FTP is open.
>
> >From the box I can FTP into itself easily.
>
> Its just FTPing from the box when in Windows which is the problem.
>
> Could it be that the machine is trying to do a DNS lookup on the IP address
> and can't wh
Caolan McNamara wrote:
>
> At 08:15 16.08.00 +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> >Anyone know how a bash / csh script can tell if it was called in a pipeline or
> >directly from the commandline? I've a script that I want to run either by
> >catting a file through a pipe or by invoking from the commandlin
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 07:49:21PM -0700 or thereabouts, Ashok Kanodia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me how to get the information on Red Hat's (RHCE) exam.
> I am trying to get the test questions for this.
Several books and websites are out there with sample questions (of
variable quality: b
At 08:15 16.08.00 +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
>Anyone know how a bash / csh script can tell if it was called in a pipeline or
>directly from the commandline? I've a script that I want to run either by
>catting a file through a pipe or by invoking from the commandline with the
>file as an arg and I n
Anyone know how a bash / csh script can tell if it was called in a pipeline or
directly from the commandline? I've a script that I want to run either by
catting a file through a pipe or by invoking from the commandline with the
file as an arg and I need the script to behave slightly differently i
34 matches
Mail list logo
