On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, C. M. Martin wrote: > Hi, everyone, > > All is working here now. Congratulations. You must be pretty relieved. > The opinion of the engineer I was working with is that the first > netstat entry *is* wrong, since the address is outside the bounds of > our network, The first destination address i.e `.56' *IS NOT* a `host address'. Its the correct `network address'. Its what you get when you `AND' the IP address of the interface with the netmask (e.g. perl -e 'print 58 & 248' ) In short, there is nothing wrong with the routing table. > Since it really doesn't break anything, we're going to worry about it > later. You got nothing to worry about coz everything is perfectly fine. bye :) Anmol _______________________________________________ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
