This is so cool! I will keep seeing whether there are any problems.
Thanks!
2016-08-03 23:34 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Aug 3, 2:29pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |Please see my comments be
o use them only if
> they can be useful.
> |
> | > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 at 5:47 PM
> | > From: "Christos Zoulas"
> | > To: "Rocky Hotas" , "Charles Cui" <
> charles.cui1...@gmail.com>
> | > Cc: "tech-userlevelnet
Hi Christos,
Please see my comments below about the real time signal bugs.
By the way, do you have any plans to commit this part?
I can change the testing program to be a unit test.
2016-08-03 0:10 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article 2sn-jsjh2hw0t4t9q_mmr...@mail.gmail.com>,
>
Never mind Rocky!
I can take this over.
Thanks Charles
2016-08-03 8:47 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Aug 3, 11:53am, rockyho...@post.com ("Rocky Hotas") wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: sched_protect(2)
>
> | Hello Charles, Christos and all!
> | I've spent all the time I could, in order to get docum
patches.
I can login into the vm via ssh, and run tests.
By the way, how do you fix the problems which makes your sshd broken?
2016-07-31 9:51 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Hi Christos,
>
>Thanks for providing these information!
> I will revisit my current code base and think carefully
Sure, I can do that.
2016-07-31 6:05 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
>
> Hi again,
>
> On a different subject, I noticed that we don't have a man page for
> sched_protect(2), can you please take a stab at writing one?
>
> Best,
>
> christos
>
Zoulas :
> On Jul 30, 11:42am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Yes, it works for me, each time I send you a new patch, I will compile my
> | kernel and userland,
> | and testing using the program we have written.
> |
> | Here
Hi Rocky,
As Christos mentioned, you can help to improve the man pages here.
If you want to take it, please add the information that Christos wants in
the
current page and also makes man sched_protect works.
After you complete it, you can either send the pull request on our github,
https://githu
I will see how to improve this part.
Thanks Charles
2016-07-29 1:00 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article ryem...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
>
> >> yes, but where does the ksiginfo get freed now since you removed:
> >> - ksi
I have see how to debug this. Hopefully my understanding for signal
delivery is enough now.
2016-07-25 13:13 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 24, 9:19pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Sure, I can implement the sigorder function
Hi Christos,
This patch fix the memory leak that you found in the RT patch.
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/REALTIME_SIGNAL/0008-bug-fix.patch
2016-07-29 9:07 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> I will see how to improve this part.
>
>
> Thanks Charles
>
2016-07-28 5:03 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article <
> ca+sxe9secy0w9cezsqxpoc2w1ypvl+inqt5rgiyap8ahzgd...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >This patch
> >
> https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/m
This patch
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/REALTIME_SIGNAL/0007-improve-efficiency.patch
improves the code efficiency and removes duplicate search in the signal
queue.
2016-07-27 10:34 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Yeah, I will try to improve the code efficie
Yeah, I will try to improve the code efficiency.
2016-07-27 10:14 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 27, 8:23am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | 3. there will be a concern if we count the number of signals each time,
> | but thi
-27 3:10 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 26, 8:15pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Hi Christos,
> | This patch fixed the bug you found
> |
> https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/REALTIME_SIGNAL/
Hi Christos,
This patch fixed the bug you found
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/REALTIME_SIGNAL/0006-bug-fix-for-real-time-signals.patch
2016-07-25 21:33 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> yeah, it seems correct,
> my solution use another array, so space complicity
I have attached the test_signal v2 version, which fills the signal
reorder function. After we fix the bug that you found,
we can use this program to test.
2016-07-25 16:03 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> I have see how to debug this. Hopefully my understanding for signal
> delivery is enou
25, 8:13pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | I have attached the test_signal v2 version, which fills the signal
> | reorder function. After we fix the bug that you found,
> | we can use this program to test.
>
> Great; I think that
Sure, I can implement the sigorder function and will get back to you soon.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-07-24 20:52 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 24, 3:00pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | I have attached the new version.
> | Bu
I have attached the new version.
But it seems both Linux and and netbsd will process signal with large signo
number first.
2016-07-23 23:44 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 23, 8:03pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Hi Christos,
&
.
Let me know if there are any problems.
2016-07-23 12:15 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
>
> 2016-07-23 3:10 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
>
>> In article <
>> ca+sxe9u+2snfnc7yov3c_b52dtcbek-9ie25+kwzosh7fnz...@mail.gmail.com>,
>> Charles Cui wrote:
>> >-=-=-
2016-07-23 3:10 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article <
> ca+sxe9u+2snfnc7yov3c_b52dtcbek-9ie25+kwzosh7fnz...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >Hi Christos,
> >Here is a improved patch based on your code review,
> >
>
-07-17 7:11 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> I will study FreeBSD logic first and share with you guys.
>
> 2016-07-17 6:39 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
>
>> On Jul 17, 2:02am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
>> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>>
>> | Hi Ch
Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 21, 10:33am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Got it, I will fix it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> | OK, I can write a program as you designed. Right now I have netbsd and
> | Linux environments, and
> | can verify t
2016-07-21 10:16 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article <
> ca+sxe9uj7lg40xyt0g1v-cznxwkrnk79t0xcd4d2-qdlrma...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
>
> >I did not quite understand it.
> >
> https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/R
Thanks Robert for your understanding.
In conclusion, you think the signals are consumed
at the time of context switch. I will keep this information
in mind and see how all functions are connected.
Thanks Charles
2016-07-20 9:15 GMT-07:00 Robert Elz :
> Date:Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:28:13
Please see my comments below.
2016-07-20 7:47 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article jbuco6x1ct4+7fjwq...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >I will study FreeBSD logic first and share with you guys.
> >
> >2016-07-17 6:39 GMT-
Hi guys,
I spent some time investigating the sigqueue code path, which is used by
realtime signals,
but I am confused about some logics,
please provide comments if you have specific knowledge about this part.
I followed the call chain path of sigqueue, and pretty confident about how
a signal is
I will study FreeBSD logic first and share with you guys.
2016-07-17 6:39 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 17, 2:02am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> | I considered the questions that you asked.
> |
real time signal number, the earlier to be consumed.)
Thanks, Charles.
2016-07-15 21:15 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Thanks for your feedbacks, I will try to fix these problems as soon as
> possible.
>
>
>
> Thanks, Charles.
>
> 2016-07-14 8:20 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
Thanks for your feedbacks, I will try to fix these problems as soon as
possible.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-07-14 8:20 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 14, 5:09pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |actual
man pages for sched_protect
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/commit/50450adf1a890965440d6e1bf9c6f113a247867e
Thanks Charles
2016-07-05 7:30 GMT+08:00 Charles Cui :
> Well, in this case, what I suggest is that I try both things at the same
> time and
> see which part is mo
Well, in this case, what I suggest is that I try both things at the same
time and
see which part is more easily for me to make a breakthrough. Sounds good?
I will let you guys know my progress.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-07-04 23:24 GMT+08:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 4, 4:34pm, mar...@duskware.de
ink that
> realtime signal support is a bit too much for GSoC, what part of mmap are
> you suggesting to do?
>
> thanks!
>
> christos
>
> On Jul 3, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Charles Cui wrote:
>
> thanks! What's the next part do you want me to focus? signal, mmap,
> S
/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/PRIOPROTECT_AND_GETCLOCK/0007-unit-test-for-scheduling-proof-of-priority-ceiling.patch
Thanks, Charles
2016-06-27 12:45 GMT+08:00 Charles Cui :
> I will think about how to do it.
>
>
> Thanks Charles
>
> 2016-06-25 6:32 GMT-07:00 Christos Zo
Yeah, I will try to construct a new test.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-06-22 15:28 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 22, 3:11pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Thanks Christos for these comments!
> | In terms of the new fi
Hi Christos,
This test generates a deadlock. t1 holds resource m1 and waits for m2,
t2 holds resource m2 and waits for m1.
Is this the result that you want to generate?
2016-06-24 6:05 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article 7dw...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cu
1:23pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Any comments on the tests?
>
> Yes, I am not finished yet testing and looking. Here are some preliminary
> ones:
>
> 1. You've added more fields to sched_params. This should no
Any comments on the tests?
2016-06-21 14:36 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Hi Christos,
>
> Some updates on the tests of priority protect.
> You need to apply my new patch here,
> https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/PRIOPROTECT_AND_GETCLOCK/0005-extend-sc
provide the test?
Thanks Charles.
2016-06-22 14:53 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 22, 1:23pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Any comments on the tests?
>
> Yes, I am not finished yet testing and looking. Here are some
:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 17, 10:45am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Yeah, that makes sense. I will see how to construct such a unit test(or
> | call it benchmark)
>
> How's that coming along? Also can you plea
com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | I have write a draft of the benchmark, but have not verified successfully
> | on the patched system.
> | The idea is to
> | 1. create a mutexattr data structure and set pthread priority protect
> | protocol.
arles Cui :
> Thanks, I will complete my test cases as soon as possible.
>
> 2016-06-14 16:02 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
>
>> On Jun 14, 3:50pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
>> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>>
>> | I got it. Thanks C
Yeah, that makes sense. I will see how to construct such a unit test(or
call it benchmark)
Thanks, Charles.
2016-06-17 10:44 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 16, 9:28pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
Thanks, I will complete my test cases as soon as possible.
2016-06-14 16:02 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 14, 3:50pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | I got it. Thanks Christos.
>
> And here it is:
>
> http://
Hi Christos,
Please find my comments below.
2016-06-14 9:50 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article <
> ca+sxe9s4by1klxgxuwwgdv+0_z-balpbg2woeg18tfyg1yw...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
> >
> >Let me know if there are problems. In the next several days
I got it. Thanks Christos.
2016-06-14 15:43 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 14, 2:25pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | One thing I guess you can commit is pthread_condattr_getclock and it's
> | man pages.
>
2016-06-14 14:14 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 14, 1:29pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | 1. add unit tests for ad's work to make sure it works well.
> | 2. may add some changes according to your comments
.
After adding the unit tests, I will continue the work of real time signals.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-06-10 16:29 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 10, 2:37pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Thanks, Christos, I will read Fre
Please see my comments inline.
2016-06-10 16:29 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 10, 2:37pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Thanks, Christos, I will read FreeBSD related code carefully.
>
> In the meantime also:
>
Hi guys,
I am trying to add the support of SIGQUEUE_MAX, which is the maximal
number of real time signals to the target process. There are several ways
to
send a signal to a process like, kill, raise, etc. I am wondering whether
all real
time signals should be only sent via sigqueue? (in which
Hi Christos,
I have PTHREAD_STACK_MIN supported and attached
patch for your review. My next step is to focus on the remaining
part of signal (SIGPOLL, _SC_REALTIME_SIGNALS and _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX).
Seems we need much more significant changes in this part.
Thanks, Charles
0003-add-PTHREAD_STAC
Cool! that's a really good idea, I will see whether SIGIO can replace
SIGPOLL totally.
Thanks for the advice!
Charles.
2016-06-07 19:44 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 7, 7:33pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: PTHREAD_STACK_MIN support
>
&
Thanks!
2016-06-05 14:00 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 5, 1:14pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: timers related
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |One quick question about this commit.
> |
> https://github.com/IIJ-
Hi Christos,
One quick question about this commit.
https://github.com/IIJ-NetBSD/netbsd-src/commit/ef38d5736b7367bff9aba260f532e5b24728b224
why do we need this line twice?
+./usr/share/man/cat3/bsd_signal.0 comp-c-catman .cat
2016-06-05 12:21 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Sure, I will keep
17:05 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 3, 5:01pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: timers related
>
> | Yes, sure. I will finish it as soon as possible.
> | And will let you know if I encounter new problems.
>
> Yes, and for all the other p
Sure, I will keep an eye on them.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-06-05 10:18 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 5, 9:53am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: timers related
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |I have completed the man pages for bsd_signal,
GMT-07:00 Zafer Aydoğan :
> You can find the FreeBSD sources at:
>
> http://src.illumos.org/source/
> or
> https://grok.dragonflybsd.org/
> or
> http://bxr.su/
>
> 2016-05-30 4:28 GMT+02:00 Charles Cui :
> > Thanks for these information!
> > I wil
Yes, sure. I will finish it as soon as possible.
And will let you know if I encounter new problems.
Thanks, Charles
2016-06-03 16:59 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jun 3, 4:37pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: timers related
>
> | Thanks Zafer
HI guys,
I have 3 timers related macro to be added, which are _SC_CPUTIME,
_SC_THREAD_CPUTIME and _SC_DELAYTIMER_MAX.
the first and second are set to be 200112L in freebsd. I am wondering
what's the meaning of those macros? and what are the cases to use these
macros? I am thinking of where to
If there are no comments for these two patches.
I will move forward for other parts.
Sounds good?
2016-06-01 19:28 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Hi guys,
>
>I have attached patches based on comments from Christos.
> The new patch used atomic_inc_uint_nv to limit the number of
&g
Hi guys,
I have attached patches based on comments from Christos.
The new patch used atomic_inc_uint_nv to limit the number of
sems used by each process. I have tested these patches.
They worked.
2016-05-30 14:19 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> good to know atomic_inc_uint_nv is implemented us
good to know atomic_inc_uint_nv is implemented using cas.
I will update the patch and send you guys later (being careful about the
format)
Thanks Charles
2016-05-30 13:46 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 30, 1:43pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: p
overhead.
2016-05-30 13:30 GMT-07:00 Martin Husemann :
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:25:34PM -0700, Charles Cui wrote:
> > there is one remaining slot. And each of them will increase p_nsem by one
> > using atomic_inc, the results are we have 1 slot overused, but the error
> is
No, using atomic_inc / atomic_dec for p_nsem is wrong!
Let's think about the multithreading case. Let's use 2 threads A and B in
the same process as an example. Assume p_nsem is not reaching the limit,
but only one slot is left.
A and B will each read the p_nsem separately. There will be probabi
Hi Kamil,
_SC_SEM_NSEMS_MAX is not the same with SEM_VALUE_MAX.
The first one is used to limit the number of sems for a process, while
the second is used to set the initial value for a semaphore.
2016-05-26 16:25 GMT-07:00 Kamil Rytarowski :
>
>
> On 27.05.2016 00:02, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>
logic for _SC_SEM_NSEMS_MAX.
I have tested 3 of these patches using posix benchmark suite, and they
worked.
I will add formal unit tests and man pages later.
Please provide comments if you have.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-05-26 15:27 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Yes, I can do 2 and 5, and fix 3.
>
Thanks for these information!
I will implement these missing features asap.
2016-05-29 6:46 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 28, 11:28pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: timers related
>
> | HI guys,
> |
> | I have 3 timers related macro
Please see my comments inline.
2016-05-26 14:35 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 26, 2:08pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: pthread library related
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |I am studying the pthread libraries in netbsd, and have
l send you guys the patch of the porting work shortly.
2016-05-26 15:02 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 26, 2:08pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: pthread library related
>
> 1. SIGRTMIN/SIGRTMAX should not be exposed (the kernel does not support
turns _POSIX_TIMER_MAX in
sysconf system call, where can I find the logic to enforce this number when
user land allocates more times than this value?
Let me know if there are any concerns.
Thanks, Charles.
2016-05-26 7:30 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 19, 5:03pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com
Thanks Christos, Martin and SODA for these advices and documents!
I will start to get familiar with freebsd designs and try to contribute as
much
as possible to netbsd community.
2016-05-19 10:36 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 18, 3:40pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wr
Thanks Martin and Soda!
How about other functions? Does it make sense to follow POSIX standard
to implement the missing functions in netbsd?
2016-05-18 19:00 GMT-07:00 SODA Noriyuki :
> > On Thu, 19 May 2016 01:13:09 +0200,
> Martin Husemann said:
>
> > int pthread_barrierattr_setpshar
Hi guys,
I spent some time on pthread libraries in netbsd which is a big part in
my project, and have some questions to ask.
Taking pthread_barrierattr_getpshared, pthread_barrierattr_setpshared
as an example. These functions are used to getting and setting barrierattr
data structure. netbsd
16, at 00:20, Martin Husemann wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:48:23PM -0700, Charles Cui wrote:
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> I have attached a patch which is used to expose SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX
> to
> >> user land. This will remove a lot of e
E defined to compile.
>
> christos
>
> On May 14, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Charles Cui
> wrote:
>
> let's call this small program as test.c.
>
> There is no problem when executing the command gcc test.c,
>
> However, when executing as gcc test.c -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=2
Hi Guys,
I have attached a patch which is used to expose SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX to
user land. This will remove a lot of errors related with those macros in
posix test benchmark (http://posixtest.sourceforge.net/). Comments are
welcomed. Besides this mail list, I believe it would be useful to al
flag is not necessary for us, then problem is solved.
2016-05-13 6:43 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 12, 9:50pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Well, your saying of _NETBSD_SOURCE is defined by default see
700, Charles Cui wrote:
> > Hi Christos,
> >
> >I got the new list post below. Note that the second list is build with
> > -D_NETBSD_SOURCE -lpthread -lrt -lm
>
> If you have a proper NetBSD build environment (native or cross compilation)
> then -D_NETBSD_SOURCE
tp://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/sys/sys/signal.h#151>#*endif* /*
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED || XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500 || _NETBSD_SOURCE */
2016-05-12 9:57 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 12, 9:22am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC proje
1 10:15 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Oh, yes, this sounds really reasonable to me.
> I will try to disable ACPI, thanks!
>
>
> 2016-05-11 7:59 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> > In article do49+oh_qc7dx4o+uewd...@mail.gmail.com>,
> > Charles Cui wrote:
> >>some u
Oh, yes, this sounds really reasonable to me.
I will try to disable ACPI, thanks!
2016-05-11 7:59 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article
> ,
> Charles Cui wrote:
>>some updates of building kernel.
>>I spend some time these days to investigate the kernel compiling
&
that cause this issue?
This is not quite related to my projects, but definitely is good to
let the community know.
*** FINAL System shutdown message from root@ ***
System going down IMMEDIATELY
power button pressed
2016-05-09 11:20 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Got it, I can start to collectin
Got it, I can start to collecting it and post you the information once I have.
Thanks, Charles
2016-05-09 10:07 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 9, 10:03am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Sure, I can do it.
&g
Sure, I can do it.
To make it clear, besides this list, you want another list that failed
the test because of it is not used in a standard way or compiler
settings?
2016-05-09 7:27 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article
> ,
> Charles Cui wrote:
>>Thanks guys for all your advi
Thanks guys for all your advices! I will try the methods proposed by
you guys and let you know once I have new results.
Right now, my way (install kernel and userland together) works (It
takes kernel and libc updates and generate expected results.) This is
the updated list (much shorter than befor
: /usr/obj/tooldir.NetBSD-7.99.29-i386/bin/nbpax: not found
2016-05-08 12:08 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 8, 11:47am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Yes, I followed the instructions.
> | I verified whether a file h
ui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Yes, I build tools locally first.
> | Before reading this file, I switched to the old kernel
> | and install userland and kernel simultaneously(no reboot).
> | And the system told me it installed suc
Some updates.
After installing userland, the header files are updated. I made the mistake in
the last email because of timezone issues, but I am still wondering
why I cannot
install userland after rebooting into the new kernel.
2016-05-08 9:56 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Yes, I build tools loca
still not updated! I am wondering which step system header files
are copied to
the system path?
2016-05-08 9:48 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 8, 9:37am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Following is the error when
R_="${this}" "$@" ${target}; }; _makedirtarget distrib/sets
installsets INSTALLDIR=/ INSTALLSETS=
*** Error code 1
Stop.
nbmake: stopped in /usr/src
ERROR: Failed to make installworld to /
*** BUILD ABORTED ***
2016-05-08 7:24 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 7, 8:5
ng me know nxr.netbsd.org, I
already used it.
2016-05-06 5:46 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On May 5, 10:14pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: refine of the GSOC project
>
> | Hi guys,
> |
> |I spend some time on researching the project and have so
Hi guys,
I spend some time on researching the project and have some results.
Based on the results, I can split the project into multiple parts and expect
to complete the project in divide-and-concur way.
I found a lot of building errors in the posix benchmark are because of
compiler settings.
Hi Christos and Martin,
I have set up my environments for development.
I guess the next step is to start to be familiar with the code
base of the POSIX test benchmarks and related kernel subsystems
in NetBSD. I think a lot of problems will be found during this phase.
Does this plan sound good
ndprotoent'
PerlSock_endprotoent();
^
reentr.h:920:30: warning: implicit declaration of function
'endservent_r' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
# define endservent()
(endservent_r(&PL_reentrant_buffer->_servent_data) == 0 ? 1 : 0)
^
thanks guys for all your advices! Those are really helpful.
I will try to find a way that works for me best. Will consult and
discuss with you guys when having new problems.
Thanks Charles.
2016-04-28 8:31 GMT-07:00 Joerg Sonnenberger :
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:11:28PM -0700, Charles
code, jump to the declaration or
usages because netbsd
has a huge code base. I am looking for a way to work efficiently with
netbsd, your
best practices would be helpful.
Thanks, Charles
2016-04-25 9:39 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Thanks guys, I will follow the link to complete the task as soon as
Thanks Martin for your reply!
2016-04-24 13:13 GMT-07:00 Martin Husemann :
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 01:00:12PM -0700, Charles Cui wrote:
>> Another thing is my mentor
>> for this project, mentors listed in the website are crispytoast and
>> martin, while I contacted
Hi Christos and NetBSD community,
Thanks for selecting me for GSOC this year. It 's my honor to join NetBSD
community and contribute my code! I will try my best to complete the task.
In terms of work needs to be done in the current stage
(community communications), I think I can start to prep
here is the link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zUd2LRm9vj-NgwLzKGcdOZ9Cd1YGpSmdBF0KLp_8Eek/edit?usp=sharing
2016-03-17 20:48 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Hi Christos,
>
>I have uploaded my proposal, you guys should be able to see it now.
> Please feel free to comment it.
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
